LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for QSERV-L Archives


QSERV-L Archives

QSERV-L Archives


QSERV-L@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

QSERV-L Home

QSERV-L Home

QSERV-L  July 2014

QSERV-L July 2014

Subject:

Re: Adding a new release of xrootd

From:

Kian-Tat Lim <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

General discussion for qserv (LSST prototype baseline catalog)

Date:

Tue, 1 Jul 2014 15:32:49 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (54 lines)

Daniel,

> You said:
> 
> "This all depends on how your distribution stack is setup and
> tagged. You can choose to have any set of versions (that is mutually
> compatible) in the distribution manifest."
> 
> But in python/eups/distrib/eupspkg.py, I can't see how to manipulate
> (and tag?) the distribution stack. There are some examples for
> creating a particular package with a version number, with source
> located <somewhere>, but it says nothing about dependencies, except
> "If foo has any dependencies, EupsPkg packages will be created for
> those as well." How does it know what versions of foo dependencies
> are needed? I suppose it could introspect and see what versions are
> "setup" or "current" at the time you ask it to "create". Does it do
> this?

	I believe (but am not certain) that the dependency versions are
either the ones recorded in the table file in the installed version of
the package that you are creating a distribution for (i.e. the setup
versions at the time you installed into the distribution stack) or the
versions currently setup at "create" time.  Mario would know this
better.

	The goal is to be able to package up and reproduce a working,
tested build; the dependency versions are thus not arbitrary.

> I feel like what I want is somewhat in conflict with what eupspkg
> wants to provide:
> I want to say: "Install package X, version A" and have the system
> respond "Oh, X depends on Y, version B. I will make sure Y version B
> is installed and then install X version A"

	Yes, that is what the manifest will do.

> Whereas I feel like eupspkg is designed to allow an arbitrary
> combination of packages, i.e., it would respond "Oh, X depends on Y.
> Oh, you have Y version C installed. That's cool, I'll use that and
> just install X version A"

	No.  *eups* is able to do the arbitrary combining, with things
like table files, version resolution order, etc. helping to limit the
arbitrariness.

-- 
Kian-Tat Lim, LSST Data Management, [log in to unmask]

########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
August 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager

Privacy Notice, Security Notice and Terms of Use