Well, the onlyh time a redirector would ignore a tried is if the tried
were malformed. It's pretty precise on how things get excluded. So, I
would like to see an instance where the tried was ignored.
Andy
On Wed, 1 Oct 2014, Lukasz Janyst wrote:
> On 10/01/2014 12:07 AM, Andrew Hanushevsky wrote:
>> The issue here is that the redirector is under no obligation to re-pass
>> opaque information. The only thing it can do is to add additional opaque
>> information. It's the client's responsibility to maintain the "tried"
>> history. I don't think the old client does this and drops the history at
>> some point (so, yes, it's a bug). The new client did much the same but
>> that is being corrected in 4.1.
>
> The new client does not drop any CGI, we observed sometimes the redirector
> would ignore the tried= cgi though. The old client is deprecated, so if it
> does not work, stop using it :)
>
> Lukasz
>
> ########################################################################
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>
> To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1
>
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1
|