Yes I like this idea...
On Oct 10, 2014, at 12:21 PM, Serguei Boiarinov <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> When we'll start to record data files we want to keep, we should probably
> start from run number bigger then biggest in test run, that way software can
> reconfigure itself based on run number, we did it in CLAS.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Andrea Celentano <[log in to unmask]>
> To: Jeremy I. McCormick <[log in to unmask]>
> Cc: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:16:23 -0400 (EDT)
> Subject: Re: EventConstants file
>
> Hi,
> You mean that there will be separate LcSimEventBuilder / EventConstant /
> ECalEvioReader / SVTEvioReader / others.. for the test run and for the
> engeneering run?
>
> I am not familiar with svn trunk, I would prefer you (or someone more
> expert than me) to configure the software structure to be compatible
> with both the TestRun and the engeneering run, and then I can modifiy
> the latter.
>
> Bests,
> Andrea
>
> On 10/10/2014 03:10 PM, McCormick, Jeremy I. wrote:
>> Yeah we need to sort that out. There will have to be seperate event builders.
>>
>> Do you want me to make a branch of HPS trunk so that you feel free to make these changes in it?
>>
>>> On Oct 10, 2014, at 10:18 AM, Andrea Celentano <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jeremy,
>>> things are moving here.. We were able to run the DAQ, write evio file on tape, read it with evio2xml and see it is fine.
>>> Then, I try to open it with the monitoring application (the direct connection with the ET ring does not work yet, waiting for ET14 next week). I see that, in
>>>
>>> org.hps.evio.EventConstant
>>>
>>> you define
>>> public static final int ECAL_TOP_BANK_TAG = 0x1;
>>> public static final int ECAL_BOTTOM_BANK_TAG = 0x2;
>>> public static final int SVT_BANK_TAG = 0x3;
>>>
>>> This was true for the test run. For the engineering run, it is (now):
>>>
>>> public static final int ECAL_TOP_BANK_TAG = 0x25;
>>> public static final int ECAL_BOTTOM_BANK_TAG = 0x27;
>>> public static final int SVT_BANK_TAG = ????
>>>
>>> I am changing this in my local copy, but not commit anything: you may want to differentiate between the test run and the engineering run (otherwise, if I commit it, someone else still working on old evio data will not be able to run!).
>>>
>>>
>>> Andrea
>
> ########################################################################
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
|