Hi again,
I didn’t hear back from anyone.
Jeremy, I see that you are doing work with the monitoring and you are at JLab. I’m not setting the priorities but I think this task is pretty high on the list for HPS. Can you help? Perhaps some of the shifters that have some experience with the software can look into this as well when there is no beam?
/pellle
On Mar 11, 2015, at 2:30 PM, Hansson Adrian, Per Ola <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> as things are going I don’t seem to get time to check that the new detector geometry works as expected in the online monitoring. Can someone exercise the new detector I announced earlier with the monitoring?
>
> In particular we need to verify that changing the opening angle in the compact and restart the session actually does what we expect i.e. moves the detector.
>
> Since we are getting closer to running and we would not be able to get tracks without this working it’s becoming more and more a critical item.
>
> Who can help? I can provide more info.
>
> /Pelle
>
> ########################################################################
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
|