That's normal, don't worry.
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015, Alessandra Filippi wrote:
> Hi,
> upon readout using HPS2014ReadoutToLcio.lcsim as steering file
> (HPSTracker2014-v0 geometry) I get a bunch of messages:
>
> Apr 23, 2015 11:37:17 PM org.hps.recon.ecal.cluster.ClusterDriver process
> SEVERE: The input hit collection EcalCorrectedHits is missing from the event.
>
> ... should I worry?
> thanks, cheers
> Alessandra
>
>
>
> On Wed, 22 Apr 2015, Sho Uemura wrote:
>
>> It's equivalent. NoPileup is a simplified version of the full simulation.
>>
>> On Wed, 22 Apr 2015, Alessandra Filippi wrote:
>>
>>> ok, if I go back to my "old" release (3.2) Sho's suggestion works:
>>> filtering slic file + HPS2014ReadoutToLcio.lcsim for readout +
>>> HPS2014OfflineRecon.lcsim (+gbl for my purposes) for reconstruction.
>>> Is this (in principle) equivalent to
>>> HPS2014ReadoutNoPileup.lcsim + HPS2014OfflineNoPileupRecon.lcsim, isn'it?
>>> thanks, cheers
>>> Alessandra
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, 22 Apr 2015, Sho Uemura wrote:
>>>
>>>> I never got to look at this - I was going to and then things got busy.
>>>>
>>>> Can you not use the full readout simulation (HPS2014ReadoutToLcio.lcsim)
>>>> instead? Pretty sure that's not broken. You will need to space out the
>>>> events first, following the instructions in this page for "electron beam
>>>> data":
>>>>
>>>> https://confluence.slac.stanford.edu/display/hpsg/Running+Readout+Simulation
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 22 Apr 2015, Hansson Adrian, Per Ola wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Alessandra,
>>>>>
>>>>> I didn't have time to test your slic file yet; it?s been pretty busy
>>>>> here as you can imagine.
>>>>>
>>>>> I?m not sure this was ever resolved but I hope Omar or Sho can tell us
>>>>> if is or if they could recreate this problem?
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope I can run your file today.
>>>>>
>>>>> /pelle
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 22, 2015, at 9:25 AM, Alessandra Filippi <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>> I dug the listserv mails to discover that the problem I'm having with
>>>>>> the reconstruction of Montecarlo data using the "standard"
>>>>>> HPS2014ReadoutNoPileup.lcsim and HPS2014OfflineNoPileupRecon.lcsim
>>>>>> (unable to find any track) is not new. I'm replying to the last message
>>>>>> of the thread... any news about it?
>>>>>> It looks like thresholds have to be disabled, at the readout step
>>>>>> (instead of using the TrackerDigiDriver driver in place of
>>>>>> TrackerHitDriver, which was my conclusion as well as Bradley's, as far
>>>>>> as I can see from his messages).
>>>>>> Can you tell me how practically to do this?
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Alessandra
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2015, Hansson Adrian, Per Ola wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Bradley,
>>>>>>> I confirm that the standard chain doesn?t work.
>>>>>>> The problem is likely in the conditions. The amplitude for the hits
>>>>>>> are way too small
>>>>>>> and therefore fails the threshold cut. I disabled the cut and create
>>>>>>> the needed hits. We
>>>>>>> will update the conditions when we get some time. Btw., for info, this
>>>>>>> is in the readout
>>>>>>> sim.
>>>>>>> However, the recon still fails because the fits to the pulse shape
>>>>>>> looks weird and I
>>>>>>> suspect it just fails (NaN and infinite values in the shape fit
>>>>>>> parameters).
>>>>>>> Sho, can you look quickly at this quickly? It looks like the pulse
>>>>>>> shapes might be fine
>>>>>>> (just looking at a few examples). shouldn?t it work even though the
>>>>>>> gain is off or is
>>>>>>> there some other threshold cut in the fitter process?
>>>>>>> I attach a readout and recon file with thresholds disabled. (A?,
>>>>>>> 2.2GeV, v8-2pt2
>>>>>>> detector).
>>>>>>> /Pelle
>>>>>>> ________________________________________________________________________________________
>>>>>>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
>>>>>>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>>>>>
>>>>> ########################################################################
>>>>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>>>>>
>>>>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
>>>>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ########################################################################
>>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
>>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>>>
>>
>> ########################################################################
>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>>
>
> ########################################################################
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
|