I can’t speak for any other changes the last few days except the ones I made here.
So I timed the recon w/ and w/o my changes to the evio conversion and the difference is 52->55ms right now so that can’t be your problem.
Does anybody remember what you had earlier in terms of execution speed for Pass2 recon, I only did it now for the first time and I’m not running all strategies.
I’m not sure if I think it runs so much slower. It’s using 100% of one of my cores for sure. Perhaps you can try at a slac node and see if it behaves the same or locally if you are running on a slac machine. Note that if you use a shared slac machine I’ve seen those sometimes be very slow depending on load.
/Pelle
On Sep 24, 2015, at 8:42 AM, Alessandra Filippi <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> When you says it “does more” you mean it takes more time? Or do you see it doing something else?
>>
>> I’m looking into it.
>
> I cannot tell if it's writing more on the slcio file as long as the run isn't finished and I can compare full run sizes. The gbl file dimension looks comparable to the old one (for 1/3 of processed events).
> So, actually I don't know it it's doing more. For sure, it's doing it more slowly...
> can any of you try on your machines if experiences the same slowdown?
> thanks.
>
>
>>
>> /Pelle
>>
>>
>> On Sep 24, 2015, at 8:19 AM, Alessandra Filippi <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> yes
>>> how do I know which strategies are running??
>>> I just need what was running for pass2, but it looks like the reconstruction it's doing much more now... and it takes forever
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, Hansson Adrian, Per Ola wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Are you doing evio to lcio?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sep 24, 2015, at 8:04 AM, Hansson Adrian, Per Ola <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps more tracking strategies are running?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 24, 2015, at 4:30 AM, Alessandra Filippi <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>> after a fresh update yesterday I realized that the reconstruction speed decreased awfully: yesterday I was reconstructing 1000 events in 25 seconds, now it takes more than 3 minutes. Also, while before 100% of the cpu was taken, now not more than 25% is used (and I'm not doing anything else on the pc). The steering file I am using is EngineeringRun2015FullReconGbl2.lcsim with GhostHits removed, the "well-behaving" code (whose version number of course I lost after the last update) was next-to-last updated after the start of pass2 production, no later than one week ago.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What happened in the meanwhile?
>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>> Alessandra
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ########################################################################
>>>>>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
>>>>>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>>>>>
>>>>> ########################################################################
>>>>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>>>>>
>>>>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
>>>>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> ########################################################################
>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
|