>
> I’m not sure if I think it runs so much slower. It’s using 100% of one of my cores for sure. Perhaps you can try at a slac node and see if it behaves the same or locally if you are running on a slac machine. Note that if you use a shared slac machine I’ve seen those sometimes be very slow depending on load.
>
ok. Since for me it's using just the 22% (while until yesterday it was
completely filling the core) I will try to reboot my machine, first thing.
Tomorrow, as I want at least one run to be finished to compare results,
and it started this morning and still runs. Well, runs... I'd say, walks
(lame) ;-)
thanks
> /Pelle
>
>
>
> On Sep 24, 2015, at 8:42 AM, Alessandra Filippi <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>>> When you says it “does more” you mean it takes more time? Or do you see it doing something else?
>>>
>>> I’m looking into it.
>>
>> I cannot tell if it's writing more on the slcio file as long as the run isn't finished and I can compare full run sizes. The gbl file dimension looks comparable to the old one (for 1/3 of processed events).
>> So, actually I don't know it it's doing more. For sure, it's doing it more slowly...
>> can any of you try on your machines if experiences the same slowdown?
>> thanks.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> /Pelle
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 24, 2015, at 8:19 AM, Alessandra Filippi <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> yes
>>>> how do I know which strategies are running??
>>>> I just need what was running for pass2, but it looks like the reconstruction it's doing much more now... and it takes forever
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, Hansson Adrian, Per Ola wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you doing evio to lcio?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 24, 2015, at 8:04 AM, Hansson Adrian, Per Ola <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Perhaps more tracking strategies are running?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sep 24, 2015, at 4:30 AM, Alessandra Filippi <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>> after a fresh update yesterday I realized that the reconstruction speed decreased awfully: yesterday I was reconstructing 1000 events in 25 seconds, now it takes more than 3 minutes. Also, while before 100% of the cpu was taken, now not more than 25% is used (and I'm not doing anything else on the pc). The steering file I am using is EngineeringRun2015FullReconGbl2.lcsim with GhostHits removed, the "well-behaving" code (whose version number of course I lost after the last update) was next-to-last updated after the start of pass2 production, no later than one week ago.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What happened in the meanwhile?
>>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>>> Alessandra
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ########################################################################
>>>>>>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
>>>>>>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ########################################################################
>>>>>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
>>>>>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> ########################################################################
>>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
>>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>
> ########################################################################
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
|