Thanks, now it's running properly again.
cheers
Alessandra
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015, McCormick, Jeremy I. wrote:
> It should be back to about 50ms per event now on trunk. I confirmed with
> the EngRun2015ReconTest in integration-tests.
>
> On Sep 24, 2015, at 5:49 PM, Hansson Adrian, Per Ola <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi again,
>
> so with a fresh update I also now see the recon being x3 slower than this
> morning. My full recon job takes 140ms/event instead of 50ms/event.
>
> Can people who have committed code today take a look at this and maybe revert
> to find the source and if it’s needed?
>
> Maybe first verify that it’s slow.
>
> /Pelle
>
>
> On Sep 24, 2015, at 9:13 AM, Alessandra Filippi <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>
> I’m not sure if I think it runs so much slower. It’s
> using 100% of one of my cores for sure. Perhaps you can
> try at a slac node and see if it behaves the same or
> locally if you are running on a slac machine. Note that
> if you use a shared slac machine I’ve seen those
> sometimes be very slow depending on load.
>
>
> ok. Since for me it's using just the 22% (while until yesterday it
> was completely filling the core) I will try to reboot my machine,
> first thing. Tomorrow, as I want at least one run to be finished to
> compare results, and it started this morning and still runs. Well,
> runs... I'd say, walks (lame) ;-)
> thanks
>
>
>
>
>
> /Pelle
>
>
>
> On Sep 24, 2015, at 8:42 AM, Alessandra Filippi
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> When you says it “does more”
> you mean it takes more time? Or
> do you see it doing something
> else?
>
> I’m looking into it.
>
>
> I cannot tell if it's writing more on the
> slcio file as long as the run isn't
> finished and I can compare full run sizes.
> The gbl file dimension looks comparable to
> the old one (for 1/3 of processed events).
> So, actually I don't know it it's doing
> more. For sure, it's doing it more
> slowly...
> can any of you try on your machines if
> experiences the same slowdown?
> thanks.
>
>
>
> /Pelle
>
>
> On Sep 24, 2015, at 8:19 AM,
> Alessandra Filippi
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> yes
> how do I know which
> strategies are
> running??
> I just need what
> was running for
> pass2, but it looks
> like the
> reconstruction it's
> doing much more
> now... and it takes
> forever
>
>
>
> On Thu, 24 Sep
> 2015, Hansson
> Adrian, Per Ola
> wrote:
>
>
> Are you
> doing
> evio to
> lcio?
>
>
> On Sep
> 24,
> 2015,
> at 8:04
> AM,
> Hansson
> Adrian,
> Per Ola
> <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> Perhaps
> more
> tracking
> strategies
> are
> running?
>
>
> On
> Sep
> 24,
> 2015,
> at
> 4:30
> AM,
> Alessandra
> Filippi
> <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> Hi
> all,
> after
> a
> fresh
> update
> yesterday
> I
> realized
> that
> the
> reconstruction
> speed
> decreased
> awfully:
> yesterday
> I
> was
> reconstructing
> 1000
> events
> in
> 25
> seconds,
> now
> it
> takes
> more
> than
> 3
> minutes.
> Also,
> while
> before
> 100%
> of
> the
> cpu
> was
> taken,
> now
> not
> more
> than
> 25%
> is
> used
> (and
> I'm
> not
> doing
> anything
> else
> on
> the
> pc).
> The
> steering
> file
> I
> am
> using
> is
> EngineeringRun2015FullReconGbl2.lcsim
> with
> GhostHits
> removed,
> the
> "well-behaving"
> code
> (whose
> version
> number
> of
> course
> I
> lost
> after
> the
> last
> update)
> was
> next-to-last
> updated
> after
> the
> start
> of
> pass2
> production,
> no
> later
> than
> one
> week
> ago.
>
> What
> happened
> in
> the
> meanwhile?
> thanks,
> Alessandra
>
> ########################################################################
> Use
> REPLY-ALL
> to
> reply
> to
> list
>
> To
> unsubscribe
> from
> the
> HPS-SOFTWARE
> list,
> click
> the
> following
> link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>
>
> ########################################################################
> Use
> REPLY-ALL
> to
> reply
> to
> list
>
> To
> unsubscribe
> from
> the
> HPS-SOFTWARE
> list,
> click
> the
> following
> link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>
>
>
>
> ########################################################################
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>
> To unsubscribe from the
> HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the
> following link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>
>
> ########################################################################
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the
> following link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>
>
>
> _____________________________________________________________________________________
>
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>
>
>
> _____________________________________________________________________________________
>
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>
>
>
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
|
