LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for HPS-SOFTWARE Archives


HPS-SOFTWARE Archives

HPS-SOFTWARE Archives


HPS-SOFTWARE@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HPS-SOFTWARE Home

HPS-SOFTWARE Home

HPS-SOFTWARE  May 2017

HPS-SOFTWARE May 2017

Subject:

Re: [Hps-analysis] Test pass1 Status

From:

Nathan Baltzell <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Software for the Heavy Photon Search Experiment <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 23 May 2017 21:06:49 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1031 lines)

2017-05-23 16:06:09 [CONFIG] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio parse :: using steering resource /org/hps/steering/recon/PhysicsRun2016FullRecon.lcsim
2017-05-23 16:06:09 [CONFIG] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio parse :: set max events to 10000
2017-05-23 16:06:10 [CONFIG] org.lcsim.job.JobControlManager addVariableDefinition :: outputFile = out
2017-05-23 16:06:10 [CONFIG] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio parse :: set steering variable: outputFile=out
2017-05-23 16:06:10 [CONFIG] org.lcsim.job.JobControlManager initializeLoop :: initializing LCSim loop
2017-05-23 16:06:10 [CONFIG] org.lcsim.job.JobControlManager initializeLoop :: Event marker printing disabled.
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.DatabaseConditionsManager resetInstance :: DatabaseConditionsManager instance is reset
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [CONFIG] org.lcsim.job.JobControlManager setupInputFiles :: No input files in XML file.
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [CONFIG] org.hps.recon.ecal.EcalRunningPedestalDriver startOfData :: minLookbackEvents: 5
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [CONFIG] org.hps.recon.ecal.EcalRunningPedestalDriver startOfData :: maxLookbackEvents: 40
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [CONFIG] org.hps.recon.ecal.EcalRunningPedestalDriver startOfData :: maxLookbackTime:-1
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [CONFIG] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio parse :: LCSim job manager was successfully configured.
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [CONFIG] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio parse :: User set detector to HPS-PhysicsRun2016-Nominal-v4-4-fieldmap with command option.
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [CONFIG] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio parse :: User set run number to 7796 with command option.
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [CONFIG] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio parse :: The job will include the following EVIO files ...
in.evio

2017-05-23 16:06:14 [INFO] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio setupEventBuilder :: using Eng Run event builder
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.DatabaseConditionsManager setDetector :: new detector HPS-PhysicsRun2016-Nominal-v4-4-fieldmap and run #7796
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [CONFIG] org.hps.conditions.database.DatabaseConditionsManager initialize :: initializing with detector HPS-PhysicsRun2016-Nominal-v4-4-fieldmap and run 7796
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [CONFIG] org.hps.conditions.database.DatabaseConditionsManager setXmlConfig :: setting XML config from resource /org/hps/conditions/config/conditions_database_engrun.xml
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [CONFIG] org.hps.conditions.database.DatabaseConditionsManager loadConfiguration :: setupSvtDetector = true
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [CONFIG] org.hps.conditions.database.DatabaseConditionsManager loadConfiguration :: freezeAfterInitialize = false
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [CONFIG] org.hps.conditions.database.DatabaseConditionsManager registerConverters :: registering default conditions converters
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.DatabaseConditionsManager openConnection :: opening connection ...
connection: jdbc:mysql://hpsdb.jlab.org:3306/
host: hpsdb.jlab.org
port: 3306
user: hpsuser
database: hps_conditions
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [INFO] org.hps.run.database.RunManager setRun :: setting run 7796
Field Map location: fieldmap/209acm2_5kg_corrected_unfolded_scaled_1.04545.dat
-----------------------------------------------------------
FieldMap3D
-----------------------------------------------------------
Reading the field grid from fieldmap/209acm2_5kg_corrected_unfolded_scaled_1.04545.dat ...
 1 X(mm)
 2 Y(mm)
 3 Z(mm)
 4 BX(1000T)
 5 BY(1000T)
 6 BZ(1000T)
 0 End of Header. Data follows in above format

 ---> ... done reading
 ---> assumed the order: x, y, z, Bx, By, Bz
 ---> Min values x,y,z: -250.0 -70.0 -1500.0
 ---> Max values x,y,z: 250.0 70.0 1500.0
 Maximum Field strength: 0.5312369527704992
 ---> The field will be offset by 21.17 0.0 457.2

 ---> Range of values x,y,z: 500.0 140.0 3000.0
-----------------------------------------------------------
2017-05-23 16:06:24 [INFO] org.lcsim.geometry.compact.converter.HPSTrackerBuilder <init> :: mille parameters will be read from compact.xml file
2017-05-23 16:06:24 [INFO] org.lcsim.geometry.compact.converter.HPSTracker2014GeometryDefinition build :: HPSTracker2014v1GeometryDefinition: Constructed 14 geometry objects
2017-05-23 16:06:24 [INFO] org.lcsim.geometry.compact.converter.HPSTracker2014GeometryDefinition build :: HPSTracker2014v1GeometryDefinition: Constructed 12 module bundles
2017-05-23 16:06:24 [INFO] org.lcsim.detector.converter.compact.HPSEcal3Converter makeSubdetectorDetectorElement :: creating detector element for subdetector Ecal
2017-05-23 16:06:24 [INFO] org.lcsim.detector.converter.compact.HPSEcal3Converter convert :: converting subdetector Ecal
2017-05-23 16:06:24 [INFO] org.hps.detector.svt.SvtDetectorSetup conditionsChanged :: activating default setup
2017-05-23 16:06:24 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.AbstractConditionsObjectConverter getData :: loading conditions set...
id: 314
name: svt_channels
runStart: 2000
runEnd: 999999
tableName: svt_channels
collectionId: 2
updated: 2015-05-04 16:26:37.0
created: 2015-03-15 23:44:16.0
tag: eng_run
createdBy: omoreno
notes: Engineering run SVT channel IDs. Loaded using SvtConditionsLoader.

2017-05-23 16:06:24 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.AbstractConditionsObjectConverter getData :: loading conditions set...
id: 313
name: svt_daq_map
runStart: 2000
runEnd: 999999
tableName: svt_daq_map
collectionId: 2
updated: 2015-05-04 16:26:37.0
created: 2015-03-15 23:44:05.0
tag: eng_run
createdBy: omoreno
notes: Engineering run DAQ map. Loaded using SvtConditionsLoader.

2017-05-23 16:06:24 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.AbstractConditionsObjectConverter getData :: loading conditions set...
id: 1316
name: svt_t0_shifts
runStart: 2000
runEnd: 9999
tableName: svt_t0_shifts
collectionId: 1940
updated: 2015-12-02 19:45:02.0
created: 2015-12-02 19:45:02.0
tag: null
createdBy: uemura
notes: null

2017-05-23 16:06:24 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.AbstractConditionsObjectConverter getData :: loading conditions set...
id: 324
name: svt_calibrations
runStart: 4823
runEnd: 999999
tableName: svt_calibrations
collectionId: 3
updated: 2016-12-05 22:10:43.0
created: 2015-04-20 02:01:55.0
tag: eng_run
createdBy: omoreno
notes: Pedestals and noise generated using run 4823.

2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.AbstractConditionsObjectConverter getData :: loading conditions set...
id: 1342
name: svt_shape_fit_parameters
runStart: 7486
runEnd: 9000
tableName: svt_shape_fit_parameters
collectionId: 1959
updated: 2016-02-21 20:56:13.0
created: 2016-02-12 21:02:27.0
tag: null
createdBy: meeg
notes: null

2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.AbstractConditionsObjectConverter getData :: loading conditions set...
id: 315
name: svt_gains
runStart: 2000
runEnd: 999999
tableName: svt_gains
collectionId: 2
updated: 2015-05-04 16:26:12.0
created: 2015-03-26 00:26:33.0
tag: eng_run
createdBy: omoreno
notes: Dummy engineering run SVT channel gains.

2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.detector.svt.SvtDetectorSetup loadDefault :: loading default SVT conditions onto subdetector Tracker
2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.detector.svt.SvtDetectorSetup loadDefault :: setting up 36 SVT sensors
2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.detector.svt.SvtDetectorSetup loadDefault :: channel map has 23040 entries
2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.AbstractConditionsObjectConverter getData :: loading conditions set...
id: 1423
name: ecal_channels
runStart: 7032
runEnd: 7874
tableName: ecal_channels
collectionId: 2017
updated: 2016-03-17 17:20:44.0
created: 2016-03-17 17:20:43.0
tag: null
createdBy: baltzell
notes: swapping

2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.AbstractConditionsObjectConverter getData :: loading conditions set...
id: 2388
name: ecal_gains
runStart: 7000
runEnd: 9999
tableName: ecal_gains
collectionId: 2976
updated: 2016-11-01 14:43:58.0
created: 2016-11-01 14:43:58.0
tag: null
createdBy: holly
notes: adjusted single channel gain which was very low for testing

2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.AbstractConditionsObjectConverter getData :: loading conditions set...
id: 1354
name: ecal_calibrations
runStart: 7350
runEnd: 99999
tableName: ecal_calibrations
collectionId: 1970
updated: 2016-02-21 11:03:28.0
created: 2016-02-21 11:03:27.0
tag: null
createdBy: baltzell
notes: 200nA peds, DAC3280, nosplitter

2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.AbstractConditionsObjectConverter getData :: loading conditions set...
id: 1424
name: ecal_time_shifts
runStart: 7000
runEnd: 99999
tableName: ecal_time_shifts
collectionId: 2018
updated: 2016-03-21 10:47:10.0
created: 2016-03-21 10:47:09.0
tag: null
createdBy: holly
notes: time offsets corrected for cable swap

2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.AbstractConditionsObjectConverter getData :: loading conditions set...
id: 414
name: ecal_pulse_widths
runStart: 0
runEnd: 99999999
tableName: ecal_pulse_widths
collectionId: 1034
updated: 2015-07-07 17:53:01.0
created: 2015-07-07 17:53:01.0
tag: null
createdBy: nab
notes: 3-pole pulse widths measured from 2015 data

2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.AbstractConditionsObjectConverter getData :: loading conditions set...
id: 2026
name: svt_bias_constants
runStart: 7796
runEnd: 7796
tableName: svt_bias_constants
collectionId: 2614
updated: 2016-09-22 09:02:44.0
created: 2016-09-22 09:02:44.0
tag: null
createdBy: spaul
notes: constants from mya

2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.AbstractConditionsObjectConverter getData :: loading conditions set...
id: 2271
name: svt_motor_positions
runStart: 7796
runEnd: 7796
tableName: svt_motor_positions
collectionId: 2859
updated: 2016-09-22 09:02:49.0
created: 2016-09-22 09:02:49.0
tag: null
createdBy: spaul
notes: constants from mya

2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.AbstractConditionsObjectConverter getData :: loading conditions set...
id: 1415
name: svt_timing_constants
runStart: 7795
runEnd: 7809
tableName: svt_timing_constants
collectionId: 1974
updated: 2016-03-16 21:44:41.0
created: 2016-03-16 21:44:41.0
tag: null
createdBy: hpsrun
notes: null

2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.evio.LCSimEngRunEventBuilder setTiTimeOffsetForRun :: TI time offset set to 1457264884019099456 for run 7796 from database
2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.evio.LCSimEngRunEventBuilder setTiTimeOffsetForRun :: Closing run manager db connection ...
2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.evio.LCSimEngRunEventBuilder setTiTimeOffsetForRun :: Run manager db connection was closed.
2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.DatabaseConditionsManager initialize :: conditions system initialized successfully
2017-05-23 16:06:25 [CONFIG] org.hps.conditions.database.DatabaseConditionsManager freeze :: conditions system is frozen
2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio run :: Opening EVIO file in.evio
Reading sequentially for evio versions 4
2017-05-23 16:06:26 [INFO] org.hps.evio.EcalEvioReader makeHits :: ECal format tag: 0xe101

2017-05-23 16:06:26 [INFO] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio run :: first physics event time: 1457265516 - Sun Mar 06 06:58:36 EST 2016
detector changed
2017-05-23 16:06:26 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.AbstractConditionsObjectConverter getData :: loading conditions set...
id: 1422
name: ecal_time_walk
runStart: 7000
runEnd: 99999
tableName: ecal_time_walk
collectionId: 2016
updated: 2016-03-17 09:49:52.0
created: 2016-03-17 09:49:51.0
tag: null
createdBy: holly
notes: time walk parameters for 2016 run

2017-05-23 16:06:26 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver process :: Event 12660624 with sequence 0
2017-05-23 16:09:12 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver process :: Event 12661624 with sequence 1000
2017-05-23 16:12:25 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver process :: Event 12662624 with sequence 2000
WTrack: this track started to go backwards?! params [WTrack params [-0.01840393600284658, -0.09382267973014823, -0.00297076545125808, 0.0956568112551805, 698.6345963812555, -718.8106636201552, -35.29517036303837, ]
 with corresponding HelicalTrackFit:
HelicalTrackFit:
d0= -0.44304712479552893
phi0= 0.16573422893898002
curvature: 0.0016409089305043862
z0= 1.2547213257138372
tanLambda= -0.03107148471696738
]
MultipleScattering: iterative intercept failed for helix
HelicalTrackFit:
d0= -0.44304712479552893
phi0= 0.16573422893898002
curvature: 0.0016409089305043862
z0= 1.2547213257138372
tanLambda= -0.03107148471696738

 at sensor with org=[ 710.03, 72.034, -29.845], unit w=[ 0.99952, 0.030891, -0.00016092]
MultipleScattering: => use simple intercept pos=[ 709.80, 79.573, -10.465]
helix pos=[ 710.03, -601.30, -31.621] dir=[ 0.00033751, -0.99952, -0.031056]
WTrack: this track started to go backwards?! params [WTrack params [-0.01840393600284658, -0.09382267973014823, -0.00297076545125808, 0.0956568112551805, 698.6345963812555, -718.8106636201552, -35.29517036303837, ]
 with corresponding HelicalTrackFit:
HelicalTrackFit:
d0= -0.44304712479552893
phi0= 0.16573422893898002
curvature: 0.0016409089305043862
z0= 1.2547213257138372
tanLambda= -0.03107148471696738
]
MultipleScattering: iterative intercept failed for helix
HelicalTrackFit:
d0= -0.44304712479552893
phi0= 0.16573422893898002
curvature: 0.0016409089305043862
z0= 1.2547213257138372
tanLambda= -0.03107148471696738

 at sensor with org=[ 710.03, 72.034, -29.845], unit w=[ 0.99952, 0.030891, -0.00016092]
MultipleScattering: => use simple intercept pos=[ 709.80, 79.573, -10.465]
helix pos=[ 710.03, -601.30, -31.621] dir=[ 0.00033751, -0.99952, -0.031056]
2017-05-23 16:15:30 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver process :: Event 12663624 with sequence 3000
2017-05-23 16:18:16 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver process :: Event 12664624 with sequence 4000
WTrack: this track started to go backwards?! params [WTrack params [-0.016553826426261777, -0.09166529190423306, 0.004913027406204339, 0.0932775039735368, 676.9208124269511, -700.0012928385588, 58.78862314834698, ]
 with corresponding HelicalTrackFit:
HelicalTrackFit:
d0= -7.942727750134551
phi0= 0.15460493410097412
curvature: 0.0016842911916920699
z0= -0.8380036540888941
tanLambda= 0.052744299277671325
]
MultipleScattering: iterative intercept failed for helix
HelicalTrackFit:
d0= -7.942727750134551
phi0= 0.15460493410097412
curvature: 0.0016842911916920699
z0= -0.8380036540888941
tanLambda= 0.052744299277671325

 at sensor with org=[ 686.37, 71.419, 29.612], unit w=[ -0.99957, -0.029415, 0.00061939]
MultipleScattering: => use simple intercept pos=[ 684.93, 120.02, 15.507]
helix pos=[ 686.37, -593.29, 53.130] dir=[ 0.0020147, -0.99861, 0.052671]
WTrack: this track started to go backwards?! params [WTrack params [-0.016553826426261777, -0.09166529190423306, 0.004913027406204339, 0.0932775039735368, 676.9208124269511, -700.0012928385588, 58.78862314834698, ]
 with corresponding HelicalTrackFit:
HelicalTrackFit:
d0= -7.942727750134551
phi0= 0.15460493410097412
curvature: 0.0016842911916920699
z0= -0.8380036540888941
tanLambda= 0.052744299277671325
]
MultipleScattering: iterative intercept failed for helix
HelicalTrackFit:
d0= -7.942727750134551
phi0= 0.15460493410097412
curvature: 0.0016842911916920699
z0= -0.8380036540888941
tanLambda= 0.052744299277671325

 at sensor with org=[ 686.37, 71.419, 29.612], unit w=[ -0.99957, -0.029415, 0.00061939]
MultipleScattering: => use simple intercept pos=[ 684.93, 120.02, 15.507]
helix pos=[ 686.37, -593.29, 53.130] dir=[ 0.0020147, -0.99861, 0.052671]
WTrack: this track started to go backwards?! params [WTrack params [-0.014869222351264314, -0.08074024802126362, 0.0013372266626372443, 0.08210888867238289, 680.8313203336338, -600.2035973952139, 19.760683467841634, ]
 with corresponding HelicalTrackFit:
HelicalTrackFit:
d0= -8.762077826802761
phi0= 0.3176859982395852
curvature: 0.001910989345322372
z0= 2.112052695486681
tanLambda= 0.016288176088411477
]
MultipleScattering: iterative intercept failed for helix
HelicalTrackFit:
d0= -8.762077826802761
phi0= 0.3176859982395852
curvature: 0.001910989345322372
z0= 2.112052695486681
tanLambda= 0.016288176088411477

 at sensor with org=[ 689.48, -29.417, 29.571], unit w=[ -0.99947, -0.032426, -0.00023661]
MultipleScattering: => use simple intercept pos=[ 688.19, 10.645, 9.8025]
helix pos=[ 689.48, -504.11, 18.187] dir=[ 0.0025155, -0.99986, 0.016286]
WTrack: this track started to go backwards?! params [WTrack params [-0.014869222351264314, -0.08074024802126362, 0.0013372266626372443, 0.08210888867238289, 680.8313203336338, -600.2035973952139, 19.760683467841634, ]
 with corresponding HelicalTrackFit:
HelicalTrackFit:
d0= -8.762077826802761
phi0= 0.3176859982395852
curvature: 0.001910989345322372
z0= 2.112052695486681
tanLambda= 0.016288176088411477
]
MultipleScattering: iterative intercept failed for helix
HelicalTrackFit:
d0= -8.762077826802761
phi0= 0.3176859982395852
curvature: 0.001910989345322372
z0= 2.112052695486681
tanLambda= 0.016288176088411477

 at sensor with org=[ 689.48, -29.417, 29.571], unit w=[ -0.99947, -0.032426, -0.00023661]
MultipleScattering: => use simple intercept pos=[ 688.19, 10.645, 9.8025]
helix pos=[ 689.48, -504.11, 18.187] dir=[ 0.0025155, -0.99986, 0.016286]
2017-05-23 16:21:23 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver process :: Event 12665624 with sequence 5000
2017-05-23 16:24:30 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver process :: Event 12666624 with sequence 6000
2017-05-23 16:27:47 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver process :: Event 12667624 with sequence 7000
2017-05-23 16:30:42 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver process :: Event 12668624 with sequence 8000
2017-05-23 16:33:48 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver process :: Event 12669624 with sequence 9000
 getPathLengthToPlaneApprox ERROR t is negative (-0.0668202694390133)!
 p 0.09937864235165567 rho 0.0015786933435923008 a 1.568884011757987E-4 A -7.888269091345609E-4 B -0.0347624769813046 C -21.56008449291011
 track params: 2.3272447819938473E-4, 0.09937301051644304, -0.001032073579953381, 0.09937864235165567, 689.4837807539794, 635.5724794378402, 17.43025643619811,
 xp [ 689.48, -29.417, 29.571]
 eta [ -0.99947, -0.032426, -0.00023661]
 h [ 0.0000, 0.0000, 1.0000]
MultipleScattering: iterative intercept failed for helix
HelicalTrackFit:
d0= 6.118759018647729
phi0= 6.1953747778289125
curvature: -0.0015787784844687803
z0= 28.325818280857433
tanLambda= -0.010385825530806936

 at sensor with org=[ 689.48, -29.417, 29.571], unit w=[ -0.99947, -0.032426, -0.00023661]
MultipleScattering: => use simple intercept pos=[ 688.08, 13.800, 23.888]
helix pos=[ 689.48, 635.63, 17.430] dir=[ 0.0022525, 0.99994, -0.010385]
 getPathLengthToPlaneApprox ERROR t is negative (-0.0668202694390133)!
 p 0.09937864235165567 rho 0.0015786933435923008 a 1.568884011757987E-4 A -7.888269091345609E-4 B -0.0347624769813046 C -21.56008449291011
 track params: 2.3272447819938473E-4, 0.09937301051644304, -0.001032073579953381, 0.09937864235165567, 689.4837807539794, 635.5724794378402, 17.43025643619811,
 xp [ 689.48, -29.417, 29.571]
 eta [ -0.99947, -0.032426, -0.00023661]
 h [ 0.0000, 0.0000, 1.0000]
MultipleScattering: iterative intercept failed for helix
HelicalTrackFit:
d0= 6.118759018647729
phi0= 6.1953747778289125
curvature: -0.0015787784844687803
z0= 28.325818280857433
tanLambda= -0.010385825530806936

 at sensor with org=[ 689.48, -29.417, 29.571], unit w=[ -0.99947, -0.032426, -0.00023661]
MultipleScattering: => use simple intercept pos=[ 688.08, 13.800, 23.888]
helix pos=[ 689.48, 635.63, 17.430] dir=[ 0.0022525, 0.99994, -0.010385]
2017-05-23 16:36:35 [INFO] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio run :: maxEvents 10000 was reached
2017-05-23 16:36:35 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver endOfDat





On May 23, 2017, at 8:50 PM, "McCormick, Jeremy I." <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Rafo, can you check in the log file for these jobs what is being loaded for the ‘svt_calibrations’ conditions set and reply with that information?
>
> It should be printed out during the job initialization.
>
> From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Rafayel Paremuzyan
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 4:34 PM
> To: Graf, Norman A.; Graham, Mathew Thomas
> Cc: Omar Moreno; [log in to unmask]; hps-software
> Subject: Re: [Hps-analysis] Test pass1 Status
>
> Hi All,
>
> Ok, outputs from Jun2016 recon, and the one from new recon are different.
> Reminder that, I have used same jar file, same detector same steering file.
>
> Attached figures represent comparison of 1st 20K events from file 7796.20
> ECal data is almost identical, attached is the cluster_X distribution comparison from two files.
> Blue is the June2016 recon file, and red is new recon file.
>
> SVT data is different, it has more 3D hits and more tracks.
> Which is probably causing it to run slower.
>
> Since both reconstructions use "Same" jar same steering files, same geometry (v4-4),
> Then it is probably something has been changed in the Database.
>
> Probably SVT experts who have modified the database since Jun 2016, can have a look into
> to see if there is something that can cause this.
>
> Rafo
>
>
> On 05/22/2017 03:46 PM, Graf, Norman A. wrote:
> Hello Rafo,
>
> I agree that the most concerning issue is the non-reproducibility of the pass0 results.
>
> Norman
>
>
> From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Rafayel Paremuzyan
> Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 12:25 PM
> To: Graham, Mathew Thomas <[log in to unmask]>
> Cc: Omar Moreno <[log in to unmask]>; [log in to unmask]; hps-software <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: [Hps-analysis] Test pass1 Status
>
> ….ARE the occupancies x2 higher???
> This was just a naive assumption, also I assumed the computing time doesn't linearly depend on occupancies,
> I was more wondered, that I can not reproduce the code speed that we had 6 months ago.
>
> Rafo
>
>
>
> On 05/22/2017 03:19 PM, Graham, Mathew Thomas wrote:
>
> 2.3 GeV data recon speed is x2 slower than the 1.05 data recon speed.
> This is concerning, but maybe there is a good reason for that, i.e. might be hit occupancies are high etc,
>
>
> ….ARE the occupancies x2 higher???
>
>
>
>
> but the other thing, that seems puzzling, is recon speed for 2.3 GeV data is now more than x2 slower
> using the same hps-java version, same detector, same java version, as we did for pass0.
>
>
> Ok, that’s legit weird.
>
>
>
>
>
> Rafo
>
>
>
> On 05/22/2017 03:10 PM, Graham, Mathew Thomas wrote:
>
> Sorry to ask a dumb question…but I will anyway.
>
> This is a “2.3 GeV vs 1.05 GeV” issue? Or an hps-java version issue?
>
> On May 22, 2017, at 12:05 PM, Omar Moreno <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Jeremy has also profiled the recon before so if Maurik can't do it, I'm sure he can.
>
> On May 22, 2017 11:46 AM, "Rafayel Paremuzyan" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi Alessandra and all,
>
> Yes clearly I see that pattern as well,
> going to the faster machine (pumpkin1), as Maurik suggested,
> recon speed increased, but 2016 recon was about x2 slower than the 2015 recon speed.
> I also tried to with -Xms=4000m -Xmx=4000m options, and without that options,
> but I didn't notice noticeable speed improvement.
>
> Another thing that is *concering* is I run
> same jar on batch farms, centos6. and centos7, and
> can't get same speed as we got during the pass0.
> Note, jar is the same, detector is the same, run number and file number is the same.
> Difference is the time when it started to tun (Oct 19 2016 vs May 21 2017)
>
> If someone is interested to look at job log files
> The log file that I run yesterday: /lustre/expphy/work/hallb/hps/data/physrun2016/tpass1/logs/hps_008054.27_pass0XML.err
> The log file that run on Oct 19 2016 for pass0 /lustre/expphy/work/hallb/hps/data/physrun2016/pass0/logs/hps_008054.27_R3.9.err
>
> I have never done profiling with java.
> I know Maurik is in workshop, he might not have time to do this,
> if someone else is set up doing this, it will probably be useful.
>
> Also, I noticed /group/hps is full
>
> Has anyone recently put some data there?
>
> Rafo
>
>
>
> On 05/22/2017 04:04 AM, Alessandra Filippi wrote:
> Hi Maurik, Rafo and all,
> I think that the different Java VM could impact on the absolute speed comparing different machines and jar versions compiled in different times... but I am running the same jar (hps-java 3.10, compiled afresh at slac on rhel6-64, jvm 1.7.0) on 2015 and 2016 data, and the factor ~2 of speed decrease for newer data is striking (whichever geometry version).
> About garbage collection, I don't use any flag in compilation, so it acts in default mode in both cases.
>
> Are 2016 data affected by more noisy hits that could extend the reconstruction time over testing all different strategies, to your knowledge?
> cheers
> Alessandra
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, 21 May 2017, Maurik Holtrop wrote:
>
> Hello Rafo,
> One thing that probably is different between the last time we ran with the 3.8 jar and now
> is a different version of the Java VM. It could well be that the newer version of Java is
> not faster. Also, it is tricky to compare Endeavour with the Jlab farm computers. They are
> probably not equivalent in speed. At UNH, Pumpkin has the more modern processors, whereas
> Endeavour is now ~5 years old.
>
> Best,
> Maurik
>
> On May 21, 2017, at 6:54 AM, Rafayel Paremuzyan <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Hi Alessandra, Norman, all
>
> thank you for replay and your tests.
>
> I tested both 2015 and 2016 data using v4-4 detector on UNH computers.
> I have use 3.8 JAR (the jar for 2015 pass6). 3.9 JAR (the jar for 2016 pass0 recon),
> and the NEW jar v051717 (the newest jar tag is v051717)
>
> Ok, I also noticed that recon of 2015 data is faster that 2016 data.
> Also seems the new jar is 20% slower than the 3.9 jar for 2016 data, and about 60%
> slower for 2015 data.
> now recon speed is about 2.55 EV/S for 2015 data, This is too slow
> it cause more than 40h for a single file.
>
> Ths is summary of code speeds with different jar files
> V4-4 Detector, UNH (endeavour), 5K events are reconstructed
>
> Events per second
> Events per second
> Events per second
>
> 3.8JAR (2015 recon jar)
> 3.9JAR, 2016 pass0 recon jar
> v051717JAR, jar vor tpass1
> 2015 Data 5772, file 20
> 5.07
> 5.19
> 3.157
> 2016 Data file 25
>
> 3.11
> 2.53
>
> *However* I looked into job Wall times for pass0 recon.
> The recon speed is more than 7.4 Events/sec, which is about x3 faster than with the
> new JAR.
>
> I again checked *same 3.9 jar*, which is slower again.
> I don't know why now the code speed is so low!
>
>
> Norman, I have tried the "-DdisableSvtAlignmentConstants", but it didn't work
>
> =================The command===============
> java -XX:+UseSerialGC -cp hps-distribution-3.11-v051717-bin.jar
> org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio -x /org/hps/steering/recon/PhysicsRun2016FullRecon.lcsim -r
> -d HPS-PhysicsRun2016-v5-3-fieldmap_globalAlign -R 7796 -DoutputFile=out_7796_0
> -DdisableSvtAlignmentConstants hps_007796.evio.25 -n 10000
>
> ============The error backtrache============
> 2017-05-21 00:45:39 [CONFIG] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio parse :: using steering
> resource /org/hps/steering/recon/PhysicsRun2016FullRecon.lcsim
> 2017-05-21 00:45:39 [CONFIG] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio parse :: set max events to
> 10000
> 2017-05-21 00:45:48 [INFO] org.hps.rundb.RunManager <init> :: ConnectionParameters {
> database: hps_run_db_v2, hostname:hpsdb.jlab.org, password: darkphoton, port: 3306,
> user: hpsuser }
> 2017-05-21 00:45:48 [CONFIG] org.lcsim.job.JobControlManager addVariableDefinition
> :: outputFile = out_7796_0
> 2017-05-21 00:45:48 [CONFIG] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio parse :: set steering variable:
> outputFile=out_7796_0
> 2017-05-21 00:45:48 [SEVERE] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio parse :: bad variable format:
> disableSvtAlignmentConstants
> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Bad variable format:
> disableSvtAlignmentConstants
> at org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio.parse(EvioToLcio.java:393)
> at org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio.main(EvioToLcio.java:97)
>
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Bad variable format:
> disableSvtAlignmentConstants
> at org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio.parse(EvioToLcio.java:393)
> at org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio.main(EvioToLcio.java:97)
>
> Rafo
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 05/20/2017 06:17 AM, Alessandra Filippi wrote:
> Hi Rafo, all,
> I also noticed that the reconstruction for 2016 data is about twice as
> slow as compared to 2015 (whichever geometry and reconstruction
> version).
> This happens when I run the aligned geometry as well as the "current"
> one (v5.0), and the geometry taken from the db as well (the result is
> the same as v5.0). I did not make any test with v4.4, though - actually
> as far as svt alignment is concerned it should be the same as v5.0. Can
> you please try and make the same short test with the newest jar with
> v4.4?
> This happens to me both with hps-java 5.10 and 5.11 (not the most
> updated one).
>
> I would be surprised if it could be something connected to the
> alignment, unless for some reason new positions and harder tracks
> trigger some long loops in the reconstruction. But this happens (to me)
> also with the
> standard geometry, so a check with the one used with pass0 (that should
> however be equivalent to v5.0) could at least help to rule out, or blame
> on, the alignment step.
> Thanks, cheers
> Alessandra
>
>
> ps. make also sure that the correct fieldmap is called in all the
> compact files - you never know!
>
>
>
> On Fri, 19 May 2017, Rafayel Paremuzyan wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> During the testing the recon for test pass1,
> I noticed the recon time is more than x2 longer wrt pass0
> recon time.
>
> To demonstrate it
> I submit 3 simple jobs with 10K events to reconstruct, with
> new pass1 xml
> file (this has the new jar v051717, and the new detector
> HPS-PhysicsRun2016-v5-3-fieldmap_globalAlign),
> and the old pass0 xml file (pass0 jar release 3.9, and the
> detector
> HPS-PhysicsRun2016-Nominal-v4-4-fieldmap)
>
> Below is a printout from the jobs with a new JAR, v051717,
> the average time
> for 1000 events is more than 7 minutes
> ===================== LOG from the v051717 JAR
> ==============================
> 2017-05-19 09:36:51 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
> process :: Event
> 10614074 with sequence 0
> 2017-05-19 09:43:13 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
> process :: Event
> 10615074 with sequence 1000
> 2017-05-19 09:49:18 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
> process :: Event
> 10616074 with sequence 2000
> 2017-05-19 09:55:54 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
> process :: Event
> 10617074 with sequence 3000
> 2017-05-19 10:02:55 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
> process :: Event
> 10618074 with sequence 4000
> 2017-05-19 10:09:57 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
> process :: Event
> 10619074 with sequence 5000
> 2017-05-19 10:16:13 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
> process :: Event
> 10620074 with sequence 6000
> 2017-05-19 10:25:20 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
> process :: Event
> 10621074 with sequence 7000
> 2017-05-19 10:32:56 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
> process :: Event
> 10622074 with sequence 8000
> 2017-05-19 10:36:19 [WARNING]
> org.hps.recon.tracking.TrackerReconDriver
> process :: Discarding track with bad HelicalTrackHit
> (correction distance
> 0.000000, chisq penalty 0.000000)
> 2017-05-19 10:42:03 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
> process :: Event
> 10623074 with sequence 9000
> 2017-05-19 10:47:44 [INFO] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio run ::
> maxEvents 10000
> was reached
> 2017-05-19 10:47:44 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
> endOfData ::
> 10000 events processed in job.
> 2017-05-19 10:47:44 [INFO] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio run ::
> Job finished
> successfully!
>
>
> And below is the Job log info from the pass0 jar. The
> average time for 1000
> events is less than 3 minutes
> ===================== LOG from the 3.9 release JAR
> ==============================
> 2017-05-19 13:19:46 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
> process :: Event
> 10614074 with sequence 0
> 2017-05-19 13:23:36 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
> process :: Event
> 10615074 with sequence 1000
> 2017-05-19 13:27:03 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
> process :: Event
> 10616074 with sequence 2000
> 2017-05-19 13:30:40 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
> process :: Event
> 10617074 with sequence 3000
> 2017-05-19 13:34:20 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
> process :: Event
> 10618074 with sequence 4000
> 2017-05-19 13:38:11 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
> process :: Event
> 10619074 with sequence 5000
> 2017-05-19 13:41:43 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
> process :: Event
> 10620074 with sequence 6000
> 2017-05-19 13:45:54 [WARNING]
> org.hps.recon.tracking.TrackerReconDriver
> process :: Discarding track with bad HelicalTrackHit
> (correction distance
> 0.000000, chisq penalty 0.000000)
> 2017-05-19 13:46:05 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
> process :: Event
> 10621074 with sequence 7000
> 2017-05-19 13:50:08 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
> process :: Event
> 10622074 with sequence 8000
> 2017-05-19 13:55:03 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
> process :: Event
> 10623074 with sequence 9000
> 2017-05-19 13:58:27 [INFO] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio run ::
> maxEvents 10000
> was reached
> 2017-05-19 13:58:27 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
> endOfData ::
> 10000 events processed in job.
> 2017-05-19 13:58:27 [INFO] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio run ::
> Job finished
> successfully!
>
> I also tried to do reconstruction by myself interactively,
> but I am getting
> error below,
>
> The command
> /apps/scicomp/java/jdk1.7/bin/java -XX:+UseSerialGC -cp
> hps-distribution-3.9-bin.jar org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio -x
> /org/hps/steering/recon/PhysicsRun2016FullRecon.lcsim -r -d
> HPS-PhysicsRun2016-v5-3-fieldmap_globalAlign -R 7796
> -DoutputFile=out_7796_0
> hps_007796.evio.0 -n 10000
>
> The Error traceback
> 017-05-19 14:58:44 [CONFIG] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio parse ::
> using steering
> resource
> /org/hps/steering/recon/PhysicsRun2016FullRecon.lcsim
> 2017-05-19 14:58:44 [CONFIG] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio parse
> :: set max events
> to 10000
> 2017-05-19 14:58:45 [CONFIG]
> org.lcsim.job.JobControlManager
> addVariableDefinition :: outputFile = out_7796_0
> 2017-05-19 14:58:45 [CONFIG] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio parse
> :: set steering
> variable: outputFile=out_7796_0
> 2017-05-19 14:58:45 [CONFIG] org.lcsim.job.JobControlManager
> initializeLoop
> :: initializing LCSim loop
> 2017-05-19 14:58:45 [CONFIG] org.lcsim.job.JobControlManager
> initializeLoop
> :: Event marker printing disabled.
> 2017-05-19 14:58:45 [INFO]
> org.hps.conditions.database.DatabaseConditionsManager
> resetInstance ::
> DatabaseConditionsManager instance is reset
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:
> /u/apps/scicomp/java/jdk1.7.0_75/jre/lib/i386/xawt/libmawt.so:
> libXext.so.6:
> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
> at java.lang.ClassLoader$NativeLibrary.load(Native
> Method)
> at
> java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary1(ClassLoader.java:1965)
> at
> java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary0(ClassLoader.java:1890)
> at
> java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(ClassLoader.java:1851)
> at java.lang.Runtime.load0(Runtime.java:795)
> at java.lang.System.load(System.java:1062)
> at java.lang.ClassLoader$NativeLibrary.load(Native
> Method)
> at
> java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary1(ClassLoader.java:1965)
> at
> java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary0(ClassLoader.java:1890)
> at
> java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(ClassLoader.java:1872)
> at java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary0(Runtime.java:849)
> at java.lang.System.loadLibrary(System.java:1088)
> at
> sun.security.action.LoadLibraryAction.run(LoadLibraryAction.java:67)
> at
> sun.security.action.LoadLibraryAction.run(LoadLibraryAction.java:47)
> at
> java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
> at
> java.awt.Toolkit.loadLibraries(Toolkit.java:1653)
> at java.awt.Toolkit.<clinit>(Toolkit.java:1682)
> at java.awt.Component.<clinit>(Component.java:595)
> at org.lcsim.util.aida.AIDA.<init>(AIDA.java:68)
> at
> org.lcsim.util.aida.AIDA.defaultInstance(AIDA.java:53)
> at
> org.hps.evio.RfFitterDriver.<init>(RfFitterDriver.java:31)
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native
> Method)
> atsun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAcce
> ssorImpl.java:57)
> atsun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstru
> ctorAccessorImpl.java:45)
> at
> java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:526)
> at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:379)
> at
> org.lcsim.job.JobControlManager.setupDrivers(JobControlManager.java:1199)
> at
> org.hps.job.JobManager.setupDrivers(JobManager.java:82)
> at
> org.lcsim.job.JobControlManager.setup(JobControlManager.java:1052)
> at
> org.lcsim.job.JobControlManager.setup(JobControlManager.java:1110)
> at
> org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio.parse(EvioToLcio.java:407)
> at org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio.main(EvioToLcio.java:97)
>
>
>
> I see this library libXext.so.6: in /usr/lib64, but not in
> /usr/lib,
> when I put /usr/lib64 in my LD_LIBRARY_PATH, then it
> complaines again (see
> below)
>
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:
> /u/apps/scicomp/java/jdk1.7.0_75/jre/lib/i386/xawt/libmawt.so:
> libXext.so.6:
> wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64
>
> I would appreciate, if I get some help on running the
> reconstruction
> interactively, then I could look more closely into logs
> of the old, and new JAR files.
>
> Rafo
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________
>
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the
> following link:
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__listserv.slac.stanford.edu_cgi-2Dbin
> _wa-3FSUBED1-3DHPS-2DSOFTWARE-26A-3D1&d=DwIDaQ&c=lz9TcOasaINaaC3U7FbMev2lsutwpI4--09aP8Lu
> 18s&r=0HDJrGO9TZQTE97J9Abt2A&m=xnbGP5VHYWRAQRWRksVgMnYvBkXWI4roLxztdJ0Tp9I&s=ppNYedSrn5DP
> aIZZJgRZu8tBDeSjroqbj_PoevFoFpI&e=
>
>
>
> ########################################################################
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__listserv.slac.stanford.edu_cgi-2Dbin
> _wa-3FSUBED1-3DHPS-2DSOFTWARE-26A-3D1&d=DwIDaQ&c=lz9TcOasaINaaC3U7FbMev2lsutwpI4--09aP8Lu
> 18s&r=0HDJrGO9TZQTE97J9Abt2A&m=xnbGP5VHYWRAQRWRksVgMnYvBkXWI4roLxztdJ0Tp9I&s=ppNYedSrn5DP
> aIZZJgRZu8tBDeSjroqbj_PoevFoFpI&e=
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________________________
>
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__listserv.slac.stanford.edu_cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FSUBED1-3DHPS-2DSOFTWARE-26A-3D1&d=DwIDbA&c=lz9TcOasaINaaC3U7FbMev2lsutwpI4--09aP8Lu18s&r=0HDJrGO9TZQTE97J9Abt2A&m=nIEvNWJSNxvmECWKfMrVKMTZKNdym3zsAls7WG1fdfU&s=cI82nYRtYBzgLs1l5g3anHrSt0kPk4B98oUzllu5KfQ&e=
>
>
>
>
>
> ########################################################################
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__listserv.slac.stanford.edu_cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FSUBED1-3DHPS-2DSOFTWARE-26A-3D1&d=DwIDbA&c=lz9TcOasaINaaC3U7FbMev2lsutwpI4--09aP8Lu18s&r=0HDJrGO9TZQTE97J9Abt2A&m=nIEvNWJSNxvmECWKfMrVKMTZKNdym3zsAls7WG1fdfU&s=cI82nYRtYBzgLs1l5g3anHrSt0kPk4B98oUzllu5KfQ&e=
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Hps-analysis mailing list
> [log in to unmask]
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hps-analysis
>
> _______________________________________________
> Hps-analysis mailing list
> [log in to unmask]
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hps-analysis
>
>
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>
>
>
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>
>
>
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>
>
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>
>
>
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>
>
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>

########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
June 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager

Privacy Notice, Security Notice and Terms of Use