LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for HPS-SOFTWARE Archives


HPS-SOFTWARE Archives

HPS-SOFTWARE Archives


HPS-SOFTWARE@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HPS-SOFTWARE Home

HPS-SOFTWARE Home

HPS-SOFTWARE  January 2018

HPS-SOFTWARE January 2018

Subject:

Re: The future of data summary tapes.

From:

Nathan Baltzell <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Software for the Heavy Photon Search Experiment <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 23 Jan 2018 14:16:03 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (88 lines)

I thought the TRefArrays prevented from even being able to … maybe there’s a way?


> On Jan 23, 2018, at 14:03, Graham, Mathew Thomas <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>
> Yeah, that’s the advantage of a flat ntuple…it’s tough to use a deep ntuple at the ROOT command line. That’s what macros are for.
>
>> On Jan 23, 2018, at 10:05 AM, Sebouh Paul <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> One advantage of the ntuples is that it is easier to write code to make plots, since the names of variables tend to be shorter. Secondly, there's the issue with TRefArray in the DSTs.
>>
>> For instance, plotting the mass spectrum of mollers would be in ntuples:
>>
>> ntuple->Draw("tarM>>h(300, 0.03, 0.07)", "abs(topTrkT-botTrkT)<3 && topTrkChisq < 30 && botTrkChisq < 30 && botP < 1.75 && topP < 1.75")
>>
>> (these correspond to track time difference of 3 ns, both tracks have chi^2 < 30, and an FEE cut on both tracks at 1.75 GeV)
>>
>> Whereas in the DSTs, you could try the equivalent, which would be like
>>
>> HPS_Event->Draw("tc_moller_candidates.mass>>h(300, 0.03, 0.07)", "abs(tc_moller_candidates.svt_tracks[0].track_time[0]-tc_moller_candidates.svt_tracks[1].track_time)<3 && tc_moller_candidates.svt_tracks[0].chi_squared < 30 && tc_moller_candidates.svt_tracks[1].chi_squared < 30 && tc_moller_candidates.particles[0].pz < 1.75 && tc_moller_candidates.particles[1].pz< 1.75")
>>
>> However, not only is this cumbersome code, it also fails to run, since it complains about not being able to find the classes for things:
>>
>> Is there some library that I am supposed to load before running this? Or is this bad syntax? If there is a way to do what I am trying to do, I stand corrected, and please let me know how to do it.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Graham, Mathew Thomas <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> I haven’t used “the" ntuple (though I have used the ntuplemaker for some stuff where I had to re-run the reconstruction myself, and I think it’s very useful).
>>
>> I really like the DSTs because it contains (almost) all of the data for an event so, besides just making your selection and looking at your e+e- candidate, you can look at what else is going on in the event. I know that the ntuple had added a lot of the information in a “flat” way, but adding new info requires remaking the ntuple instead of just re-running a root macro.
>>
>> Now, maybe there are some calculations done in the making of the flat ntuple that can’t be done in the DST? Like something that requires the geometry?
>>
>>
>>> I would like to see if the time is here to really get going on a discussion about our data summary output. From what I observe, there is a quick hack that started with Sho and that grew organically into what is now the Tuple Maker. There is a lot to be said for this system, including that it is used by quite a few of you, but I don’t think I could argue this is the ideal situation. The recent effort to re-factor it and document it was excellent. Was that enough? Can this system be considered production ready now?
>>> We also have a DST maker, which Omar produced and maintains, which had some thought go into the design, but it seems does not fit people’s needs, else there would be no need for a tuple maker. What would make the DST maker universal?
>>>
>>> So, now that we have some experience with all this, I would like to start a discussion on what it is that we actually want for a DST output, and how would we get there. I would like this to be a discussion at our next software meeting, but if that is too soon, we can also discuss it in the next one.
>>>
>>> Can someone present the pro side of the tuple maker? Holly? Miriam?
>>> Can someone present the pro side of the DST maker? Omar?
>>> What are the limitations in either of the implementations?
>>>
>>> To get you thinking about the topic, let me make some controversial statements:
>>>
>>> • Is the underlying reason for the Tuple maker, and the clunky Java to text file to ROOT mechanism, that LCIO is simply a horrible data format?
>>> • So should we get rid of LCIO then, which seems to have hampered our ability to write the data we want to write on many occasions?
>>> • If not, why the text file?
>>> • Is there an issue with how we use, and understand, the ROOT file format, and the various ways in which you can use it to access structured data?
>>> • Do we want the data structured, or do we prefer a simple tuple because it is easier?
>>> • We risk making mistakes in the analysis because we do not know exactly what went into our output. We also risk wasting people’s time if they started out with the “wrong” dst and then have to switch to the other one. How do we avoid these pitfalls?
>>> • Is this not really a concern? Nothing to see here, carry on….
>>>
>>> I hope we can find our way out of what appears to me is our current not so great situation.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Maurik
>>>
>>>
>>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
>>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>>>
>>
>>
>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>>
>>
>
>
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>

########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
June 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager

Privacy Notice, Security Notice and Terms of Use