LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for QSERV-L Archives


QSERV-L Archives

QSERV-L Archives


QSERV-L@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

QSERV-L Home

QSERV-L Home

QSERV-L  February 2018

QSERV-L February 2018

Subject:

Re: Qserv ingest/ indexing performance, questions about

From:

BECKETT George <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

General discussion for qserv (LSST prototype baseline catalog)

Date:

Thu, 8 Feb 2018 08:05:46 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (48 lines)

Hi K-T and Fabrice,

Thanks for the feedback. We'll think more about your feedback as we progress the setup of a multi-node UKIDSS instance in Qserv--and start to experiment with indexing.

I'll let you know when we've made some progress.

Thanks again,
George.

Cc: Teng, Dominique, Fabio, Emmanuel, Qserv Team.

--
Dr George Beckett,
University of Edinburgh

Email: [log in to unmask]
Tel: +44 131 651 3577 (EPCC) /
      +44 131 6688 255 (Astronomy)
Web: http://www.epcc.ed.ac.uk/

The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.


-----Original Message-----
From: Kian-Tat Lim [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: 24 January 2018 22:13
To: Fabrice Jammes <[log in to unmask]>
Cc: BECKETT George <[log in to unmask]>; QSERV-L <[log in to unmask]>; LI Teng <[log in to unmask]>; Emmanuel GANGLER <[log in to unmask]>; Fabio Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>; Dominique Boutigny <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [QSERV-L] Qserv ingest/ indexing performance, questions about

> In my understanding, we do not index tables on worker for now. 
> [...] and we try not to add indexes on the worker to save space, and time. 

While others can speak to the situation in our current instances, we absolutely must have indexes on the worker nodes to support "small"
queries in full production.  These would include an objectId index (in addition to the "secondary index") and a spatial index (HTM-based in the baseline).

It is true that indexes on measured columns like flux/magnitude are not likely to be worth the space or time given the relatively large fraction of rows that would be returned by a query on the index -- as long as we are using spinning media.  Because of seek penalties, a full table scan is preferred to an index lookup for anything more than tiny numbers of rows.

--
Kian-Tat Lim, LSST Data Management, [log in to unmask]

########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
August 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager

Privacy Notice, Security Notice and Terms of Use