LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for HPS-SOFTWARE Archives


HPS-SOFTWARE Archives

HPS-SOFTWARE Archives


HPS-SOFTWARE@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HPS-SOFTWARE Home

HPS-SOFTWARE Home

HPS-SOFTWARE  February 2019

HPS-SOFTWARE February 2019

Subject:

Re: ECal-SVT relative alignment

From:

"Nelson, Timothy Knight" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Software for the Heavy Photon Search Experiment <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 25 Feb 2019 20:26:28 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

Right, but the field map changed, no?

Tim

> On Feb 25, 2019, at 11:19 AM, Nathan Baltzell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Tim pointed out the bottom right, py vs dx, “funny business” could be from the current cluster corrections.  But from what I understand, and Holly reminded me, those corrections were calculated from full 3-D field in SLIC and truth position at ECAL, so independent of changes to the extrapolator in reconstruction.  Did we not really have full 3-D field in SLIC/GEANT?
> 
> -Nathan
> 
>> On Feb 25, 2019, at 13:02, Graf, Norman A. <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello Nathan,
>> 
>> Thanks for this update. I'll have to spend some time digesting the information. 
>> 
>> I posted the original plots on the 2pt3gev channel in slack.
>> 
>> Norman
>> 
>> 
>> From: Nathan Baltzell <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2019 9:26 AM
>> To: Graf, Norman A.
>> Cc: [log in to unmask]; hps-software
>> Subject: Re: ECal-SVT relative alignment
>> 
>> Hi Norman And All,
>> 
>> I started to look into this.  I think Norman is right that there’s an issue with the old method, *especially* if a correction is already applied in the nsigma.  Meanwhile, I do remember its original incarnation gave different results than the software geometry at the time (asymmetric top/bottom, per survey), and was reasonably consistent with an independent method.
>> 
>> Anyway, I went back to just cluster/track positions (using the pass4 2016 ntuples), and I don’t yet find any evidence that we need to move the calorimeter in Y.  Various plots attached, we can discuss in a meeting or on slack;  I’ll put together a proper presentation if people want.  There does appear to be some funny business maybe related to magnetic field or non-calorimeter alignment.
>> 
>> -Nathan
>> 
>> P.S.  I heard there was a Slack channel on this, but couldn’t find it.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Feb 14, 2019, at 19:43, Graf, Norman A. <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear Colleagues,
>>> 
>>> One of the few outstanding issues holding up the generation of a high-statistics MC sample to accompany the 2016 data analysis is the determination of the ECal position relative to the SVT. I have repeated the analysis pioneered by Nathan to plot the track-cluster match nSigma vs y for the 2016 data. Specifically, I used the FEE runs 7479 and 7483. I get essentially the same values (~42.5) as were found for the 2015 data. I have posted plots and some description to the slack 2pt3gev channel. I would appreciate it if someone were to review the methodology to ensure that this technique is valid, i.e. that there are no hidden corrections in the calculation of nSigma which would skew the measurement.
>>> 
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Norman
>>> 
>>> If anyone wants to replicate this, I used the org.hps.analysis.alignment.SvtCalorimeterAlignmentDriver class with the following modification to pick up the new FEE collection,
>>> 
>>>    protected void process(EventHeader event) {
>>>        List<ReconstructedParticle> rpList = event.get(ReconstructedParticle.class, "FinalStateParticles");
>>>        if (event.hasCollection(ReconstructedParticle.class, "OtherElectrons")) {
>>>            rpList.addAll(event.get(ReconstructedParticle.class, "OtherElectrons"));
>>>        }
>>>        for (ReconstructedParticle rp : rpList) {
>>> 
>>>            if (!TrackType.isGBL(rp.getType())) {
>>>                continue;
>>>            }
>>> 
>>>            // require both track and cluster
>>>            if (rp.getClusters().size() != 1) {
>>>                continue;
>>>            }
>>> 
>>>            if (rp.getTracks().size() != 1) {
>>>                continue;
>>>            }
>>> 
>>>            double nSigma = rp.getGoodnessOfPID();
>>>            Track t = rp.getTracks().get(0);
>>>            TrackState trackAtEcal = TrackStateUtils.getTrackStateAtECal(t);
>>>            double[] tposAtEcal = trackAtEcal.getReferencePoint();
>>> 
>>>            // look for calorimeter edge wrt SVT
>>>            if (tposAtEcal[2] > 0) {
>>>                trkAtEcalXvsNSigmaTop.fill(nSigma, tposAtEcal[2]);
>>>            } else {
>>>                trkAtEcalXvsNSigmaBottom.fill(nSigma, -tposAtEcal[2]);
>>>            }
>>>        }
>>>    }
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>>> 
>>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
>>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>>> 
> 
> 
> ########################################################################
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
> 
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1


########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
June 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager

Privacy Notice, Security Notice and Terms of Use