 |
 |
I think it is useful (and 100K is the order of magnitude of the sp4 request that is intended). I think we should make the SP4 request anyhow, though. thanks ric P.S. Daniele, can you evaluate the effective Xsection of the dec file? On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 [log in to unmask] wrote: > Hi, > should we make a quick SP3/8.8.1b production at the INFN farm? The > technicalities are already set up and I could start with e.g. 100K events. We > would have them in a few days. What do you think? > Ciao, Concezio. > > Daniele del Re wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I committed two new .dec files for Vub signal MC: > > > > ProdDecayFiles//BB_BrecoCocktail_Xulnu.dec for mix > > ProdDecayFiles//BB_BrecoCocktail_Xulnu_VUB.dec for not-res > > > > They generate B0/+ with a B->Xulnu on one side and a Breco Cocktail on > > the other. I changed a bit the official .dec for Breco cocktail in order > > to include all the B decay modes present in the DECAY.dec that we are able > > to reconstruct. Moreover I added three decay modes of the charged D > > not present (Dc->k2pipi0, Dc->kspipi0, Dc->ks3pi) since we are > > reconstructing them. > > > > I tested the files and they seem to work fine. > > > > Daniele > >