Hoi Daniele In Alessio's posting, the breakdown into superblocks is missing. I find the following: Updated IBU chains -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > original TS Ibu TS dupli Ibu TS > >Dstar : 33376 > sub1 47755 32921 1618 271710 > sub2 335800 223109 11992 150254 > sub3 234785 181374 18342 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 455340 618340 >Dc : 21002 > sub1 27987 41053 1357 368848 > sub2 399950 480601 19297 1198129 > sub3 1359859 1011040 16872 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1587979 1787796 >Dstar0: 12814 > sub1 19936 28914 9 243090 > sub2 274420 308806 192 1171574 > sub3 1298478 1046507 420 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1427478 1592834 >D0 : 38636 > sub1 53553 9754 563393 > sub2 625498 32365 1314534 > sub3 1472164 1412533 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1916563 2151215 My (summed) yields are consistent with Alessio's different summed yields (they'd better be, we use the same chains). In summary, we usually have 88-90% of the 'original TS' yields for the sum of all modes, except in the case of dstar (73%). sub1 has much lower yields in all seeds on IBU level. We should discuss the implications of this situation for production. Cheers, --U.