 |
 |
Hoi, 1. MM scans as a function of the Mx cut: Mx cut <BRBR> e-4 Plot ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.45 148+/-11 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/062102/MM-1.45-stability.eps 1.50 146+/-10 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/062102/MM-1.50-stability.eps 1.55 157+/-10 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/062102/MM-1.55-stability.eps 1.60 187+/-11 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/062102/MM-1.60-stability.eps 1.65 187+/-11 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/062102/MM-1.65-stability.eps 1.70 181+/-11 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/062102/MM-1.70-stability.eps 1.75 186+/-12 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/062102/MM-1.75-stability.eps The error quoted on <BRBR> is the error of a fit with a constant, indicated on the plots with a yellow band. For the remaining scans, the Mx cut was set to 1.55 GeV. 2. Scan over p*: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/062102/P-stability.eps I am confused as to why lowering the p* cut does not propagate into the fit. Need to look more closely. 3. Scan over Mx: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/062102/Q-stability.eps The categories are: 1 Q = 0 (default) 2 Q = -1, 0 3 Q = 0, +1 4 Q = -1, 0, +1 Cheers, --U.