 |
 |
Hoi, the following is my summary of the decisions (to be) taken, please post corrections as followups. Tracks/Photons -------------- We focus on GTVL/AS, taking care not to eliminate Ks daughters. CT/AS is the obvious fallback solution. Smearing -------- 30% increase in resolution for SP3 tracks. No smearing for SP4 tracks yet. This is based on exclusive reconstruction, may (or not) be appropriate for inclusive Mx. For neutrals: SP3: 2.5% killing and 1.5% smearing. On SP4: 2% smearing and a shift of -0.0075, no killing. That should give at least a first order approximation to the real resolutions. Will solve the technical problem of (not) applying smearing today. Data set -------- Status quo, i.e. R8 for Run 1. MC sample --------- Combine SP4 and SP3 for Run1. Plots to be posted on the agreement between the SP4RUN1 and SP4RUN2. Mx cut ------ We all agree that we need to show the result when varying the mxhad cut. We discussed on whether or not we take a decision before unblinding on how we choose this: (1) significance of the result, (2) overall goodness of fit. While avoiding a bias, we also need to avoid any model-dependence answer present in the MC. In the end we agreed that the discussion is not yet over, but that we don't disagree too strongly ... Ks mass ------- Status quo K+ momentum ----------- Apply the momentum correction, show the change, apply no lower cut on the momentum. Next Meeting ------------ Sometime Monday. Conflicts between Rome and PAC/AWG meeting. Need to discuss the BAD then. The review committee would like to see the BAD before our next review meeting, and would like to have it for a minimum of two days to digest it. Cheers, --U. > From: Franz Muheim <[log in to unmask]> > To: Urs Langenegger <[log in to unmask]> > Cc: Franz Muheim <[log in to unmask]>, > Daniele delRe <[log in to unmask]>, > Review of Vub Breco -- Franz Muheim <[log in to unmask]>, > Marie-Helene Schune <[log in to unmask]>, > Stephane Willocq <[log in to unmask]> > Subject: Re: Review starting up again > Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 19:13:53 +0100 (BST) > > Hoi Urs, > > The review committee is in favour of getting ythe new BAD abefore the > meeting. But we need a minimum fo two days, so that we can devote enough > time for reading it. > > > We are alos concerned that the final BAD will be available before the > last possible date 21. June. This allows for no slippage at all. > > We really would prefer to obtain the new BAD next Monday with the aim > of having a final document one week later, provided there are no problems. > > Cheers > > > > Franz