 |
 |
is the difference in quadrature correct? I mean, here we are addining just background events. The increase in MC statistics is fake... On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Riccardo Faccini wrote: > it is to be noted that the result on the generic agrees with the default > value within the systematics from MC statistics that we would > quote here... > ciao > ric > > On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Daniele del Re wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > in order to quantify the impact of the crossfeed in the measurement, I > > fit the data both with generic MC and generic+crossfeed MC as model. > > > > The results are: > > > > generic: > > > > BRBR = 0.0140658 +- 0.00365657(stat) +- 0.00198155(MC stat) > > > > > > generic + crossfeed: > > > > BRBR = 0.0137173 +- 0.00345909(stat) +- 0.00192688(MC stat) > > > > > > So the difference is the 0.0035 and the systematics we can quote is 2.5%. > > > > Daniele > > > > > > > > > > > >