 |
 |
In the MC generic I see very similar behaviours than in data. I think we should: 1) compute the correct uncerrelated error. Luigi committed his code to do it. 2) understand the "crazy" points. This fit instability could affect all the comparisons! Another very nice thing I am noticing is the P* spectrum on the cocktail and generic MC. As Urs poined out, the dependency is similar to the one on data. Both onthe generic and on the cocktail we have a not negligible fraction of pure resonant MC in. That depletion around 1.5 GeV can reflect this. BTW, is it possible to repeate the scan on the generic MC with half of the statistics (in order to have the same stat error we have on data)? Daniele On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Urs Langenegger wrote: > > Hoi, > > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/070402/scan.ps.gz > > contains the usual scans on generic and cocktail MC. Not yet awake > enough to be sure what to make of them, but: > > o both Q0 and Q1 have some slopes in mm2 (just like data in B0) > o p* cut dependence is systematically the same for B0 in cocktail and > generic in Q0 and Q1 (namely a drop towards higher cut values) > > Cheers, > --U. > >