Print

---

Hi Daniele,

do you also have the plots for this Mx fits?

Oliver

On Sat, 6 Jul 2002, Daniele del Re wrote:

>
> Hi all,
>
>  I repeated the fit using Mx instead of the fitted Mx.
>
>  These are the results:
>
>
>  Q=0
>
>  All
>    BRBR = 0.0175419 +- 0.00407794(stat) +- 0.00118571(MC stat)
>    chi2=0.883673
>
>  B0
>    BRBR = 0.00401112 +- 0.00680338(stat) +- 0.0019864(MC stat)
>    chi2=0.994055
>
>  Bch
>    BRBR = 0.0264318 +- 0.00509347(stat) +- 0.00171483(MC stat)
>    chi2=1.66344
>
>
>
>  Q=1
>
>  All
>    BRBR = 0.0254868 +- 0.00452458(stat) +- 0.00137868(MC stat)
>    chi2=0.891207
>
>  B0
>    BRBR = 0.0142957 +- 0.00719002(stat) +- 0.00221697(MC stat)
>    chi2=1.20538
>
>  Bch
>    BRBR = 0.0332868 +- 0.00586739(stat) +- 0.00192195(MC stat)
>    chi2=0.607417
>
>
>  The results are perfectly in agreement with the ones obtained
> with mxhadfit (compare with the table in the BAD). The errors are of the
> same order. You can comment the chi square by yourself.
>
>
>  Daniele
>
>
>