Print

Print



sure

http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/

Q=0

All   dataFINALmxhadkpfitresults_nocat.eps

B0    dataB0FINALmxhadkpfitresults_nocat.eps

Bch   dataBchFINALmxhadkpfitresults_nocat.eps


Q=1

All   datach101FINALmxhadkpfitresults_nocat.eps

B0    datach101B0FINALmxhadkpfitresults_nocat.eps

Bch   datach101BchFINALmxhadkpfitresults_nocat.eps


 Daniele


On Sat, 6 Jul 2002, Oliver Buchmueller wrote:

>
>
> Hi Daniele,
>
> do you also have the plots for this Mx fits?
>
> Oliver
>
> On Sat, 6 Jul 2002, Daniele del Re wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> >  I repeated the fit using Mx instead of the fitted Mx.
> >
> >  These are the results:
> >
> >
> >  Q=0
> >
> >  All
> >    BRBR = 0.0175419 +- 0.00407794(stat) +- 0.00118571(MC stat)
> >    chi2=0.883673
> >
> >  B0
> >    BRBR = 0.00401112 +- 0.00680338(stat) +- 0.0019864(MC stat)
> >    chi2=0.994055
> >
> >  Bch
> >    BRBR = 0.0264318 +- 0.00509347(stat) +- 0.00171483(MC stat)
> >    chi2=1.66344
> >
> >
> >
> >  Q=1
> >
> >  All
> >    BRBR = 0.0254868 +- 0.00452458(stat) +- 0.00137868(MC stat)
> >    chi2=0.891207
> >
> >  B0
> >    BRBR = 0.0142957 +- 0.00719002(stat) +- 0.00221697(MC stat)
> >    chi2=1.20538
> >
> >  Bch
> >    BRBR = 0.0332868 +- 0.00586739(stat) +- 0.00192195(MC stat)
> >    chi2=0.607417
> >
> >
> >  The results are perfectly in agreement with the ones obtained
> > with mxhadfit (compare with the table in the BAD). The errors are of the
> > same order. You can comment the chi square by yourself.
> >
> >
> >  Daniele
> >
> >
> >
>
>