Hi, > > 1) data-MC comparison is bad for B0 in the depleted sample. In particular > > look at the pstar spectrum, nneutral and MX. > > How do you determine the "recoil" B? At the moment (HEAD of CVS), > recoilNtp still uses == 2 to check against overlap with the BRECO > candidate; I guess that this is not the right thing to do. This will > affect any recoil (and depleted/enhanced, since the decision is based > on kaons in the recoil) quantity. I fixed this problem (I am going to commit it) and I rerun everything accepting only events in which the best B id the first one (that removes events affected by the problem about overlap). Now the results are pretty encouraging: data generic B0 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/BFROOT/www/Physics/Analysis/AWG/InclusiveSL/ islrecoil/comparisons2/datageneB03 data generic ChB http://www.slac.stanford.edu/BFROOT/www/Physics/Analysis/AWG/InclusiveSL/ islrecoil/comparisons2/datageneChB3 The problem in the B0's seems to be gone. Even the mm2 plot for ChB looks better. Daniele