First, let's make sure that Beta and anaRecoil are equivalent as far as the PID killing is concerned... then no objections. Once we will have a large fraction of new skimmed generic MC we will rerun everything Daniele On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Riccardo Faccini wrote: > Hi Daniele, > I would consider applying PID killing at the root level, at least until a > new crucial problem in MC is found. Of course we need to fix the tags and > get a correct set, in case we really need to rerun. > > What are the objections to this approach? > ciao > ric > > On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Daniele del Re wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > the disagreement I showed in the last comparison data-MC in many plots > > (in p* spectra and mx) is due to a wrong PID killing applied at Beta > > level. Actually it seems that the PID killing is not applied at all for > > the muons. > > > > I discovered the problem just redoing the PID killing at root code level > > (anaRecoil) and comparing. > > > > In > > > > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/test2/test2-comp.html > > > > you find the comparison between the MC with the PID killing at Beta level > > and the MC with PID killing at anaRecoil level. > > > > 1) muons: difference is dramatic. Probably the PID killing was not > > applied at all. > > > > 2) electrons: no striking differences > > > > In > > > > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/testdatanew/testdata-comp.html > > > > you can find the new comparison data - MC (using the PID killing at root > > code level). (to be compared with the old > > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/BFROOT/www/Physics/Analysis/AWG/InclusiveSL/islrecoil/datacock0825_56fb-1/datacock0825_56fb-1-comp.html) > > > > > > All the MC needs to be rerun. We should understand how this problem could > > happen and why the tags we are using are not correct. > > > > Daniele > > > > > > > > > >