 |
 |
Hi all, seems (but the job that verifies this assumption is still running) that the problem was related to a given file that i found to be corrupted. I've removed that file and I ran over the 'sampled' data chain wihtout any problem. You can find the chains that I've used in http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~asarti/recoil/chains/ (those chains are also linked in the production webpage). Let me know any problem related to those files/chains. Alessio ______________________________________________________ Alessio Sarti Universita' & I.N.F.N. Ferrara tel +39-0532-781928 Ferrara roma +39-06-49914338 SLAC +001-650-926-2972 On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Urs Langenegger wrote: > > Hoi Alessio, > > I presume that by now you also found that we have a memory leak: > > CPU time : 61308.65 sec. > Max Memory : 873 MB > Max Swap : 920 MB > > > It seems to me that the messed up Ks indices occur only at the end of > this particular job. is this true in all cases? If yes, then it's > probably a memory problem. > > I guess we'll have to find the memory leak. It'll speed up the job > significantly. > > BUT: I also think it would be very useful if you could prepare a set > of chains containing not more than 10^6 -- 10^7 (???) events. It does > not seem very useful to spend a day in the queue when we can merge > histograms and trees in a much shorter time. > > Cheers, > --U. >