 |
 |
Hi Urs, VubAnalysis rf-100902c fixes this, please let me know if there are still problems (even later on, you have my cell phone number). The reason why I did not like your tag was that it commented out my code to remove the unmatched clusters ... ciao ric On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Urs Langenegger wrote: > > Hoi Ric, > > I have your tag: > > iris01>cvs diff -r rf-100902b *.*cc recoilNtp.hh > cvs diff: I know nothing about recoilDSysDict.cc > cvs diff: I know nothing about recoilNtpDict.cc > > I make everything from scratch: > > iris01>gmake -f Makefile clean anaRecoil > > It compiles and links just fine, I run it > > iris01>../bin/Linux24/anaRecoil -c chains/sx-test -y 2 -D . > > Much output snipped: > > ./sx-test.root > Opened ./sx-test.root > > *** Break *** segmentation violation > Abort > > gdb shows: > > (gdb) where > #0 0x40fc0091 in recoilNtp::doSplitOffStudy (this=0xbffa867c, book=true) at splitOff.icc:49 > #1 0x40fcea3e in recoilNtp::bookHist (this=0xbffa867c, dump=0) at bookHist.icc:305 > #2 0x0804d79e in main (argc=7, argv=0xbffff124) at anaRecoil.cc:192 > #3 0x4116d647 in __libc_start_main (main=0x804bcf4 <main>, argc=7, ubp_av=0xbffff124, init=0x804b4bc <_init>, > fini=0x8063b04 <_fini>, rtld_fini=0x4000dcd4 <_dl_fini>, stack_end=0xbffff11c) at ../sysdeps/generic/libc-start.c:129 > (gdb) print book > $1 = true > > The problem is that *because* you have a flag to protect the booking, > the crucial return from doSplitOffStudy when called from bookHist is > not encountered. This screws Linux24. I found this out yesterday > night. I fixed it (the hard way), but you did not like my fix. > > So, please provide a tag where we can run without getting debugging > trees and histograms for the splitoff study. ASAP. Else I don't think > we'll have enough time to digest the plots for Friday. > > > Cheers, > --U. >