 |
 |
Hi urs, opening one of the files you point at, for istance /nfs/farm/babar/AWG12/ISL/sx-071802/newsig/rootfiles/vubmc-2002-new2002-1.root I find the runnumber 1726414 which bfreport classifies as 1726414 2k B -> Xu l nu incl. only which means B_Xulnu_VUB.dec, i.e. non resonant only the mixed sample (i.e. hybrid) is B->Xu l- nubar+CC whose .dec is B_Xulnu.dec there are 3M events of this kind already produced. I would say that they have not been run on yet (I cannot even find the tcls, but I might be wrong) ciao ric On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Urs Langenegger wrote: > > Hoi Daniele, > > > I discovered (unfortunately too late) that the "official" chains contain > > only the non-resonant signal MC. Looking into the directories I did not > > which chains do you mean with "official"? The final in "csx-111202" > ones or the signal ones in "sig"? > > The signal chains in chains/csx-111202 contain (as far as I can tell) > the *hybrid* (is that what you mean with mixed?) signal MC, not the > non-resonant MC: > > csx-vubmc-2000 > csx-vubmc-2001 > csx-vubmc-2002 > > This is equivalent to what we have in the "signal" directory > (discarding a handful of old MC affected by the KS bug). > > I have added the new resonant production to chains/csx-111202: > > csx-vubreso-2002 > > I have searched for the nonresonant MC, but I do not find either > chains or tcl files for it. I guess we have to wait for Alessio. > > > Cheers, > --U. >