 |
 |
Hi all, I've taken a quick look into the recoilDSys.cc code and I couldn't find were we are imposing the constraint for the sum of semielptoni B decays to add up to 10.4%.... I do not remember if I was in charge of that or if Ric implemented it but maybe we can take a new look at the code and understand if it working correctly.. Alessio ______________________________________________________ Alessio Sarti Universita' & I.N.F.N. Ferrara tel +39-0532-974328 Ferrara roma +39-06-49914338 SLAC +001-650-926-2972 "... e a un Dio 'fatti il culo' non credere mai..." (F. De Andre') "He was turning over in his mind an intresting new concept in Thau-dimensional physics which unified time, space, magnetism, gravity and, for some reason, broccoli". (T. Pratchett: "Pyramids") On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Daniele del Re wrote: > > Hi all, > > plots for the B and D systematics on data are > > D BR's: > > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/Dsyst.eps > > B BR's: > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/Bsyst.eps > > B+D BR's: > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/BDsyst.eps > > B+D systematics on data is 4.4% > > > plots for scan cutting on integrated purity are > > cut on the minimum value (intpur>cut) > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/minintpurminintpur.eps > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/minintpurminintpurdiff.eps > > cut on the maximum value (intpur<cut) > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/maxintpurmaxintpur.eps > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/maxintpurmaxintpurdiff.eps > > > Daniele > >