Print

---

Hi Alessio,
if I am not wrong it was done by assigning to the D** non resonant
component a value that was
total-sum of other 4 modes.
	do you recall the same?
	ciao
	ric

On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Alessio Sarti wrote:

> Hi all,
> I've taken a quick look into the recoilDSys.cc code and I couldn't find
> were we are imposing the constraint for the sum of semielptoni B decays to
> add up to 10.4%....
>
> I do not remember if I was in charge of that or if Ric implemented it but
> maybe we can take a new look at the code and understand if it working
> correctly..
> Alessio
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Alessio Sarti     Universita' & I.N.F.N. Ferrara
>  tel  +39-0532-974328  Ferrara
> roma  +39-06-49914338
> SLAC +001-650-926-2972
>
> "... e a un Dio 'fatti il culo' non credere mai..."
> (F. De Andre')
>
> "He was turning over in his mind an intresting new concept in
> Thau-dimensional physics which unified time, space, magnetism, gravity
> and, for some reason, broccoli".  (T. Pratchett: "Pyramids")
>
> On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Daniele del Re wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> >  plots for the B and D systematics on data are
> >
> >  D BR's:
> >
> >  http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/Dsyst.eps
> >
> >  B BR's:
> >  http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/Bsyst.eps
> >
> >  B+D BR's:
> >  http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/BDsyst.eps
> >
> >  B+D systematics on data is 4.4%
> >
> >
> >  plots for scan cutting on integrated purity are
> >
> >  cut on the minimum value (intpur>cut)
> >  http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/minintpurminintpur.eps
> >  http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/minintpurminintpurdiff.eps
> >
> >  cut on the maximum value (intpur<cut)
> >  http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/maxintpurmaxintpur.eps
> >  http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/maxintpurmaxintpurdiff.eps
> >
> >
> >  Daniele
> >
> >
>
>