Print

Print


Hoi,

here is the full list of systematics jobs I ran. 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
j00  default, ursl-112702bis    0.0186079 +- 0.00265021(stat) +- 0.00146837(MC stat)
j01  trk killing 1.3%/1.6%      0.0190465 +- 0.00266228(stat) +- 0.0014944 (MC stat)
j02  trk killing 1.3%/2.5%      0.0185922 +- 0.00264268(stat) +- 0.00153336(MC stat)
j03  no kaon PidKilling         0.0183171 +- 0.0025495(stat)  +- 0.0014283 (MC stat)
j04  no neutrals smearing       0.0184739 +- 0.0025375(stat)  +- 0.00140824(MC stat)
j05  ka eff +2%                 0.0182091 +- 0.0025957(stat)  +- 0.00145816(MC stat)
j06  ka eff -2%                 0.0185147 +- 0.00259249(stat) +- 0.00142605(MC stat)
j07  ka mis +10%                0.0194732 +- 0.00262255(stat) +- 0.00142315(MC stat)
j08  ka mis -10%                0.0193142 +- 0.00258354(stat) +- 0.00140779(MC stat) 
j09  default again              0.0183824 +- 0.00258376(stat) +- 0.00145584(MC stat)
j10  el eff +2%                 0.0188634 +- 0.00256837(stat) +- 0.00142657(MC stat)
j11  el eff -2%                 0.0184217 +- 0.00255032(stat) +- 0.00142972(MC stat)
j12  el mis +10%                0.0198809 +- 0.00257702(stat) +- 0.00141022(MC stat) 
j13  el mis -10%                0.0195494 +- 0.00257245(stat) +- 0.00139646(MC stat) 
j14  default again              0.0195263 +- 0.0025662(stat)  +- 0.00139902(MC stat)
j15  mu eff +2%                 0.0198895 +- 0.00263745(stat) +- 0.00142837(MC stat)
j16  mu eff -2%                 0.0208533 +- 0.00272544(stat) +- 0.00151923(MC stat)
j17  mu mis +10%                0.0185189 +- 0.00263228(stat) +- 0.00147756(MC stat)
j18  mu mis -10%                0.0193403 +- 0.00265003(stat) +- 0.00147681(MC stat)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I am a bit concerned as to how useful these numbers are. As long as we
run with kaon Pidkilling, we'll never reproduce the "default" j00, and
the variations can be ~40% of  the statistical error.  See j09 and j14
compared to j00. This might also go into the direction of what Daniele
has seen in his evaluation of the neutral systematics.


Cheers,
--U.