 |
 |
Hoi, I have reproduced the data-reduction/"efficiency" table 8. It'll be in the new BAD, or in http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/effTable.ps.gz A few remarks: o The mm2 cut is much less efficient on the signal than it used to be (54.1% -> 42.3% for the single cut) o The overall efficiency for signal is at 30.1% which is not quite what we give in table 12 from the fit. I am not quite sure about the difference, but think that this is probably due to the fact that in this table the normalization sample does not have a p* cut applied. o The signal efficiency on the depleted sample is quite high. For this table I had to run anaRecoil. I find that the default fit is different from the default fit obtained with the output of anaQA, when both are run without PidKilling (for Kaons): k00 CF default, ursl-121002, no Kaon PK 0.018483 +- 0.00254913(stat) +- 0.00142799(MC stat) k09 CF default again 0.018483 +- 0.00254913(stat) +- 0.00142799(MC stat) k21 CF anaRecoil 0.019723 +- 0.00264981(stat) +- 0.00144295(MC stat) I don't yet know why that is (or could be). There is no difference between k00 and k09, both are with anaQA and they should be identical, it's just a paranoia check that we have no random sequence hidden somewhere. Cheers, --U.