 |
 |
Alessio, could you tell me again how you get your numbers? skimData gives me B+B- generic (all SP4) 151518168 B0B0bar generic (all SP4) 146336064 To these events you need to subtract: 34M B+B- with Kaon bugs 21M B+B- with beamspot bugs The same numbers (34M+21M) for B0B0bar So at the end you will get: 96M B+B- => 183 fb-1 91M B0B0bar => 173 fb-1 I think you can still use the ~40fb-1 with the beam spot bug, the software fix for that works OK. Ciao, Concezio. Alessio Sarti wrote: > Ok, > as usual I managed to make more and more confusion. > > > > > skimmed unskimmed total SP4 > > > > 6 + 144 + 50 200 B0 > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > I didn't realized that the problem was here :( sorry. > > Right numbers (again) are: > 6 + 114 + 50 170 B0 > > > > 7.6 + 110 + 42 160 B+ > > > > > Two questions: > > That question remain:: > > > > > 1) is that what we expect (please concezio can you validate thos numbers?) > > That one is solved now :)) !!!!! > > > > > 2) Concezio (again) why there's that discrepancy btw B0 and B+ ? > > > > > > > > From the talk linked in the coll meeting agenda > > > > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/BFROOT/www/Organization/CollabMtgs/2002/detDec2002/Mon2/bozzi.pdf > > > > i see that the number quoted (185 fb-1 overall) is in good agreement with > > > > what I see... (200+160)/2 ..... > > > > > > Ok now we have 165fb-1 aginst 185fb-1 I'll debug with concezio why those > numbers are different...... > > Hope that now the situation is clarified. > Alessio > > > > > I've already started the production of what is missing and I'll keep all > > > > of you up to date. > > > > > > > > Let me know any questions comments. > > > > Alessio > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >