 |
 |
actually even the mm2 scan for the new selection is not the same as in the BAD. May you send me your fit output files? I will try to rerun the fit and compare. Daniele > > in http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/011603/ you'll observe > that the mm2 scan is not quite the same as in July even for the old > track/photon selection. Trk3Gam0 screws the B+ in the mm2 scan badly, > while the B0 are decent (better than the current B+). This was > different in July, where the B+ scans both in mx and mm2 were stable. > > I would not say that this increases my confidence in any physics- > inspired explanation. > > Cheers, > --U. > >