Hoi Daniele,
yes, they are not identical, but the binning in the mm2 cut is
different. The features are quite similar both for the scans mm2 and
mx, I'd say.
The outputfiles are in ~ursl/root/anaQA-l0{0,1}/. The naming
convention is as follows:
b{al,ch,nu}-00-m for mx scans
b{al,ch,nu}-00-n for mm2 scans
The cut value is appended after '-m' and '-n', respectively.
The fits are not affected by the historic relic in the fitting code,
since that only affected fits on the depleted sample, not the enhanced
sample (and the scans are on the enhanced set).
Cheers,
--U.
