 |
 |
I have checked for all Bs the agreement between data and MC on Mx in bins of mm2 and per year. You can find it in mm2<0 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~rfaccini/phys/vub/deltam/comparison7mxhadfitallcuts-mm2-1.ps 0<mm2<0.5 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~rfaccini/phys/vub/deltam/comparison7mxhadfitallcuts-mm2-2.ps 0.5<mm2<1.5 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~rfaccini/phys/vub/deltam/comparison7mxhadfitallcuts-mm2-3.ps 1.5<mm2<6 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~rfaccini/phys/vub/deltam/comparison7mxhadfitallcuts-mm2-4.ps mm2>6 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~rfaccini/phys/vub/deltam/comparison7mxhadfitallcuts-mm2-5.ps As you can see the situation gets worse at low values of mm2, the worst agreement being for mm2<0. As far as different years are concerned 2000 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~rfaccini/phys/vub/deltam/comparison7mxhadfitallcuts-2000.ps 2001 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~rfaccini/phys/vub/deltam/comparison7mxhadfitallcuts-2001.ps 2002 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~rfaccini/phys/vub/deltam/comparison7mxhadfitallcuts-2002.ps all the years show an effect, compatibly with the statistics ciao ric