Hi all,
As Ric has already pointed out in a private email I was looking at an old
reference for what concerne the D_1 and D_2 BR values.
The correct ref. is given in the BAD (ref 40).
I've taken a close look at all the values.
Here's the summary:
as taken from setion 2.4 in paper linked here:
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~asarti/recoil/0112028.ps
> Old 2000::
> B0={10.2,2.10,4.68,0.,0.63,0.23};
> ErrB0={0.4,0.19,0.22,0.,0.10,0.08};
> New proposal 2002::
> B0={10.5,2.11,4.60,0.,0.63,0.23};
> ErrB0={0.8,0.17,0.21,0.,0.10,0.08};
>
> Old 2000 ::
> B+={10.2,2.15,5.30,0.,0.56,0.29};
> ErrB+={0.4,0.22,0.80,0.,0.16,0.33};
New proposal 2002::
B+={10.2,2.15,5.30,0.,0.63,0.23};
ErrB+={0.9,0.22,0.80,0.,0.10,0.08};
(seems that the quoted result on D_1 and D_2 is valid for both B0 and B+).
Is that right for everybody?
If so I'll commit and tag the changes.
Alessio
