 |
 |
Hoi Ric, thanks for the feedback. I have implemented all except > 2. section 3.1: the definition of deltaE and Mes are incorrect > (mes=sqrt(S/4-p*^2); deltaE=E*-sqrt(S)/2) I guess this is inconsistent in our code. CompSemiExclSelectBCand.cc uses the cms frame, but I think that we fill the ntuple with the values from BtaBVariables. If I am not mistaken we take mes from BtaBVariables and that uses the lab version for mes (again, if I don't err). > 5. end of section 3.3: did we switch the definition of eps_u and eps_mx? > are the numbers there correct? Not sure I see where this is. I did introduce the variables to be consistent with the table. > 6. section 4, third to last paragraph. I do not think it is useful to > mention again the meaning and value eps_u. I would only quote eps_mc at > this point, but I would not say that it depends only on theo input. > In a presentation I would also like to show the result in terms of p*,Q^2 > and also neutral and charged multiplicity (I think we need to make these plots). With p* you mean the fit-derived overlay? Or the data/MC comparison for low mx? I am not sure about the first option. Cheers, --U.