 |
 |
Hi daniele, few minor comments: - please add 'DEPLETED' to the bottom table (formal, but relevant detail...) - electrons on depleted are only 1.5 sigma from the enriched measurement(6.8+/-3.1% as opposed to 1.9%) - I would say that the only error that looks astray is the Bch-depleted, since in all other cases the average of the susbsamples seems to have the right error (did not check central values) - for the next iteration, is it possible to have signal expectations on the vcb subtracted plot also for the multiplicity fit? ciao ric On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Daniele del Re wrote: > > Hi, > > here two tables with the new results and plots > > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/newres.html > > My comments: > > 1) fits on superblocks are closer now > 2) ele went up, muon went down > 3) I am just noticing that only run2 has the excess at 1.5 GeV... > 4) multiplicity fit is now very close to the default result > 5) all depleted fit are a bit higher (and electrons have a two sigmas > effect) > 6) depleted error have some strange behaviour > > > Daniele >