 |
 |
oho ... this is amaizingly small ... anyhow we seem to see that the sensitivity is below 1%. Do we want to quote these numbers in the BAD and lower the systematics to 0.5%? ciao ric ______________________________________________________ Riccardo Faccini Universita' "La Sapienza" & I.N.F.N. Roma tel +39/06/49914457 Fax.: +39/06/4957697 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~rfaccini Univ. La Sapienza. 2,Ple Aldo Moro, I-00185 Roma Dipartimento di Fisica "We need serenity to accept what we cannot change, courage to change what we can and wisdom to distinguish between the two" [R. Kiplin, allegedly] On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Urs Langenegger wrote: > > Hoi, > > I ran and set the emc energy of all truth-identified klong clusters to > 0. The result is > > Batch Description BRBR > =================================================================== > o12 KL EMC clusters = 0 0.0203027 +- 0.00250567 > o01 with KL scaling 0.0201532 +- 0.00251257 > o00 default 0.0202685 +- 0.00250473 > > > At least it's in the other direction compared to increasing the > deposited energy with Alessio's scaling. > > In case you check in the logfiles (at the usual places): The > printout's claim of scaling with a number is wrong, because I only > updated the code but not the printout... > > Cheers, > --U. >