 |
 |
Thanks Urs, forgot to mention: did you redo also the scans (in particular the Mx one)? ciao ric On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, Urs Langenegger wrote: > > Hoi, > > I ran with the new generic MC included and have updated the BADs: All > numbers (except the multi fit numbers in 540 which I accidently > deleted and which are being redone at the moment) and the plots in 582 > are updated. All changed a bit, have a look for yourself. > > In http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/032803/main.ps.gz you can > find the usual set of data/MC comparisons. > > The efficiency tables in 540 still need to be updated (I'll do that), > and also the zillion of fit plots (I don't want to change the naming > scheme now). > > The muon misid jobs are still running. > > Also: It would be very beneficial if some else could run all the fits > so that we have two independent cross-checks. > > Another thing: I think it would be even more useful if someone could > check the computation of the branching fraction b2ulnu with error > propagation from BRBR. Same for Vub. I think it would defeat the > purpose if this were done with my code. > > Cheers, > --U. > >