Hi Urs,
some minor details:
- missing parenthesis in the B(b->u) result in the abstract
- one suggestion for shortening the first paragraph:
" The biggest challenge in this analysis is the reduction of b->c
background which leads to a stringent selection and consequently large
theoretical uncertainties on the extrapolation to the full phase
space[2]." (I don;t feel strongly about this, just have the impression a
single sentence on this is better than two, and shorter)
- is formfactors a single word?
- page 5 first column "These criteria improves the resolution in
the measurement of the missing neutrino" is quite obvious, since we are
cutting on mm2 ... I would drop this and write "These criteria suppress
..."
- page 6 column 2: when we talk of ss~ popping we talk of
"exclusive" component. For your same arguments, shouldn't we use
"resonant" ?
> you can find the replies to Stephane's posting. Please read it, there
> is one non-trivial item (introduction remark on systematics due to
> Ru/sl -- I think we should remove the words on efficiences).
I don't understand were are you pointing at. Did you already remove them
in the current version? Of course whatever we can through away without
losing clarity we should (we are ~15 half-lines long)
This are all minor point. As far as I am concerned once any fraction of
them is implemented the paper can be sent back to the RC for approval to
the pubboard
ciao
ric
