 |
 |
Hi all, update on analysis presented last monday can be found in: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~asarti/recoil/talks/130503.html The page is organized as following: 1) Data-MC comparison for new-old kinematic variables (q2,Ew+pw,Csi,x_x(old w),x) 2) Signal-bkg comparison and resolution at MC level for all variables 3) Correlation for all the different kin variables (added missing mass) 4) Subtracted spectra for variables of intrest and LAST but not LEAST 5) Study on power of q2 cut reducing our model sys error Especially that paragraph (even if I've tried to be as clear as possible) can ba a bit tough to read and understand at once. Please read it carefully and let me know any comment-question-suggestion. As a general comment on the very last point (that is the one we discussed most at yesterday meeting) I can say that: Using just the nonresonat MC model I see a reduction of model sys error of ~50% cutting at q2 = 10 while going to our hybrid reweighted MC this suppression power seems completely gone (sys error ~ same for any q2 cut in range 0-12). This needs a further investigation and further debugging. Let me know any comment. Alessio ______________________________________________________ Alessio Sarti Universita' & I.N.F.N. Ferrara >>>I'm in Ferrara<<< tel +39-0532-974328 Ferrara roma +39-06-49914338 SLAC +001-650-926-2972 "... e a un Dio 'fatti il culo' non credere mai..." (F. De Andre') "He was turning over in his mind an intresting new concept in Thau-dimensional physics which unified time, space, magnetism, gravity and, for some reason, broccoli". (T. Pratchett: "Pyramids")