 |
 |
Hi, This version is basically ok for me, but I would like these comments to be considered: at this point I would remove 'this measurement represents a challenge' since it is no more useful reference [2] is not used and I would drop the second part of it: if you specify what D(*) means you should also say what D^(**) is ... "the prompt lepton yield is extracted with the BB~ mixing parameter" doen not make too much sense to me. I prefer what was suggested to us by Bob in the CW review "and the average mixing rate was used to extract the prompt lepton yield." take away 'in data' in the caption of fig 2b 'removing removing ' (in K0l session) table II: 'missing (%) in the second column labelling' I would change the caption into 'Summary of systematic uncertainties', thus saving a line ... too many digits in the measurements of lambda_bar and lamda_1 ciao ric On Wed, 14 May 2003, Riccardo Faccini wrote: > Hi Urs, > the only time slot I would be free this week is today after dinner (say > after 12am your time), but I don't think we need to meet. I would suggest > that we all read your current proposal > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~rfaccini/phys/vub/prl/prl_paper.ps > and send comments by SLAC afternoon. If there is anything to debate we > should arrange private conversations with you. IMVHO whatever you have in > your hands this evening should be upoloaded and posted (togetherr with my > responses, you can do it or let me do it tomorrow, as you wish). > Don't forget that we have lots of occasions for higher order corrections > (at least other two passes, pub-board readers and referee comments) > ciao > ric > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 16:48:37 -0700 (PDT) > From: [log in to unmask] > To: [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask], > [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask], > [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask] > Subject: Update of /afs/slac.stanford.edu/g/babar/repo/BAD/note582 > > Distribution: CVSNEWS > > I've just committed some changes in my source files. The log message was: > > Name: ursl ********************************** > Update of /afs/slac.stanford.edu/g/babar/repo/BAD/note582 > In directory shire05:/afs/slac.stanford.edu/u/ec/ursl/private/tex/phys/BAD/note582 > > Modified Files: > paper2.tex prl_paper.tex references2.tex > Log Message: > Part 2 of my proposed changes. You can find comments on what I changed > in > > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/fsx/commentsToPapers/b2u/finalEdit.0 > > I guess we should iterate on this proposal. I propose to a have the > very "final" reading after we have settled all remaining issues > between ourselves (i.e. I expect that you propose to change my changes > :-) > > Cheers, > --U. >