Hoi Ric,
> I also tried to fix the D(*), D(**) problem by expliciting all the cases
> (and some gymnastic to keep the same length):
> "
> The simulation of the $\Bxclnu$ background uses
> a parametrization of HQET formfactors for $\Bb\to
> D^{*}\ell\nub$~\cite{ref:duboscq}, and models for $\Bb\to
> D \pi \ell\nub$ and $ D^* \pi \ell\nub$~\cite{ref:goityroberts}, $\Bb\to D
> \ell\nub$ and $ D^{**}\ell\nub$~\cite{ref:isgwtwo}.
> "
I am not sure the current version is OK. You define D to be a D* or a
D, but three lines above you have D and D* in different meanings. I
think we should probably/maybe move ISGW2 forward wrt to GR. The
current formulation of "B -> Dpilnu and D*pilnu" is also not
consistent with the style of the second column, we'd have to use ','
or "decays".
I think we maybe should use a footnote to explain D(*) and D(**).
Cheers,
--U.
