Hoi Ric,
another comment.
> As far as the comment on the theoretical error, I would truncate the
> sentence as he suggests, but put no reference. It is after all a general
> statement on the analysis.
I think I was unclear in the formulation. This statement did NOT refer
to the current analysis precisely because it has such a large
acceptance and therefore QHD is not much of an issue for us. It
actually was OK to have the reference to QHD there.
Maybe we should have had something like
"leads to complications in the theoretical description of traditional
approaches\ref{}"
to make it clear that the "novel analysis method" described in the
second paragraph falls into a different class.
Just my $0.02...
Cheers,
--U.
