 |
 |
Hi Urs, > > Hoi Ric, > > > I cannot follow your argument. The non-resonant MC plain wrong, > > If we think so than we should use ISGW2. Then we should not mix in > something that is wrong. If we think that the non-resonant is wrong, > then we will not combine with b2sg. All of the inclusive b2u analyses > relie on the non-resonant approach (one can argue about the model for > the SF we put in, but this is not the point here). > I think the non-resonant is wrong because it is missing the resonant part and this is why we are creating the hybrid. Do you agree that the efficiencies estimated on the non-resonant MC would be wrong? ciao ric