Print

Print


Hi Ric-

I have done a plot by plot comparison in the events tree between anaQA and
the new code to check that they are identical - which they are.  I have
also verified neutral smearing, track smearing and pid killing.
I should point out that the new code does not contain anything that
wouldn't have been compiled in anaQA FAST mode, so those things are now
eliminated.

Ed


On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Riccardo Faccini wrote:

> Hi Ed,
> thanks for this effort. What is the status of validation of the machinery,
> did you already check the results are identical (and all plots we used to
> use are still there)?
> 	thanks
> 	ric
>
> On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Edward John Hill wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Tommorow, I will tag and commit the new code that will inherit the new
> > recoil base class in RecoilAnalysis.
> >
> > The new stuff is:
> >
> > VubAnalysisCode.hh
> > VubAnalysisCode.cc
> > VubAnalysisApp.cc
> >
> > If you want different names, please reply and I'll change them before I
> > commit tommorow.
> >
> > Also, the Makefile will have some changes apart from the addition of the
> > new stuff to it.  recoilNtp and recoilNtpDict will be removed from the
> > NTUPLES and anaRecoil & abcRecoil will be removed (well, commented out at
> > this stage).  anaQA will remain in the Makefile as well as the recoilNtp
> > code will remain in the package so anyone can still use recoilNtp/anaQA,
> > although the idea is to maintain VubAnalysisCode in the long run.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Ed
> >
> >
> >
>