 |
 |
Here's my proposal, (let me know if anybody has anything against it and I'm going to stop immediately): --> Current situation is.... Signal tcl files are kept in:: /nfs/farm/babar/AWG18/ISL/sx-080702/tcls_sum02/signconc/ Rootfiles produced are kept in:: /nfs/farm/babar/AWG23/ISL/sx-080702/newsig/rootfiles Rootfiles have CORRECT naming scheme. *mix*.root contains mix and *nre*.root contain JUST non-resonant contribution. Tcl files NOT: they have been mixed up (some *mix* tcl files contains mix and some just nonresonant). --> In order to fix and clarify: I'm going to create a new directory for tcl file were the naming will be correct. (and match actually with root files) BUT I'm also gingo to leav the old tcl files in 'signconc' dir for matching with old logfiles. Then I'e going to update the web page with instruction saying where tcl files should be taken from. If that's ok for everybody I'll proceed and make the changes. Alessio ______________________________________________________ Alessio Sarti Universita' & I.N.F.N. Ferrara >>>I'm in Ferrara<<< tel +39-0532-974328 Ferrara roma +39-06-49914338 SLAC +001-650-926-2972 "... e a un Dio 'fatti il culo' non credere mai..." (F. De Andre') "He was turning over in his mind an intresting new concept in Thau-dimensional physics which unified time, space, magnetism, gravity and, for some reason, broccoli". (T. Pratchett: "Pyramids") On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Kerstin Tackmann wrote: > > Hi Ric, all, > > so far my understanding of the mismatch in the 2002 signal MC files had > been, that at the tcl and hbook file level filenames containing "mix" > actually refered to nres MC and the other way round. > > However, my impression is, that this is only partially the case. When I > take the runnumbers I get from your reduced ntuples from 2002 and try to > trace those numbers in the 2002 tcl files it looks like the files > vubmix-2002-new2002-n.tcl with 61<=n<=75 > contain "mix" in their names AND refer to mix signal MC. > Looking at the mxhadgen spectrum from these files it clearly looks like > hybrid model to me. > > So I guess what we should do is use our rootfiles coming from these tcl > files for the hybrid signal MC rather than renaming them and take them as > nonresonant. Do you agree? > > Kerstin > > > > On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Riccardo Faccini wrote: > > > Hello Kerstin, > > I have found the reason for the mismatch you were seing in the 2002 files. > > > > It is a Sarti effect which is already registered in > > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/lwgate/VUB-RECOIL/archives/vub-recoil.200211/Author/article-57.html > > > > file names got swapped between hybrid and non-resonant, but the situation > > was adjusted when doing h2root. The problem is that the tcl files still > > have the names swapped! > > This is quite dangerous. I wander if we should make a new directory and > > make the appropriate files, to make sure we do not screw up in future > > tests... > > > > ciao > > ric > > >