Ok.
Seems that confusion is growing.
This is basically due to my BAD english so you're right when you try to
double check what I say.
That's the status of my current knowledge of the problem:
1) Tcl files in
/nfs/farm/babar/AWG18/ISL/sx-080702/tcls_sum02/signconc
AND
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/BFROOT/www/Physics/Analysis/AWG/InclusiveSL/islrecoil/tcl/signconc/
ARE buggy. This is seen by Kerstin and I've crosschecked that.
2) So far the only buggy files that I've found are the:
vubXXX-2002-new2002-Y.tcl
ones with XXX = nre,mix and Y <= 60.
Those files have names that have been swapped: so the "mix" contains
nonresonant events and "nre" the hybrid ones.
This is also what Kerstin see. (but she needs to run against 2000 and 2001
tcl files too).
3) The root files used for the prl (VubAnalysis/chains/signal) are OK. The
nonresonant ("nre") file contains JUST nonresonant events and the "mix"
one contains the expected hybrid events.
4) I'm making up the directory
/nfs/farm/babar/AWG18/ISL/sx-080702/tcls_sum02/signalMC/FIXED that
contains the tcl files with FIXED tcl names. Before the release of that
directory and update of documentation I'll wait Kerstin to finish her
test. After that I'll proceed.
Let me know if there's anything unclear.
Cheers,
Alessio
______________________________________________________
Alessio Sarti Universita' & I.N.F.N. Ferrara
>>>I'm in Ferrara<<<
tel +39-0532-974328 Ferrara
roma +39-06-49914338
SLAC +001-650-926-2972
"... e a un Dio 'fatti il culo' non credere mai..."
(F. De Andre')
"He was turning over in his mind an intresting new concept in
Thau-dimensional physics which unified time, space, magnetism, gravity
and, for some reason, broccoli". (T. Pratchett: "Pyramids")
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Kerstin Tackmann wrote:
>
> Hi Alessio,
>
> are you saying that the n=60 file have not been swapped for 2002? Because
> my impression was that these actually have swapped names.
>
> I will let you know when I checked the 2000 and 2001 files (which will not
> be today, I guess).
>
> Kerstin
>
>
>
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Alessio Sarti wrote:
>
> > So far I've crosschecked what you're seeing.
> > The fact is that *nre* and *mix* tcl files ave been swapped for
> > vubXXX-2002-new2002-*n*.tcl files with n<60.
> >
> > I'll rename them and announce the new tcl files directory.
> >
> > I'll try also to look into 2000 and 2001 tcl files but the best would be
> > to have Kerstin producing a list of what she see to have a crosscheck....
> >
> > Root files are fine (so the PRL is).
> > alessio
> >
> > ______________________________________________________
> > Alessio Sarti Universita' & I.N.F.N. Ferrara
> >
> > >>>I'm in Ferrara<<<
> >
> > tel +39-0532-974328 Ferrara
> > roma +39-06-49914338
> > SLAC +001-650-926-2972
> >
> > "... e a un Dio 'fatti il culo' non credere mai..."
> > (F. De Andre')
> >
> > "He was turning over in his mind an intresting new concept in
> > Thau-dimensional physics which unified time, space, magnetism, gravity
> > and, for some reason, broccoli". (T. Pratchett: "Pyramids")
> >
> > On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Kerstin Tackmann wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hi Alessio,
> > >
> > > I took the tcl files from the following directory:
> > > BFROOT/www/Physics/Analysis/AWG/InclusiveSL/islrecoil/tcl/signconc/
> > >
> > > I think for 2002 the tcl files with numbers smaller and equal to 60 have
> > > confusing names such that
> > > vubnre-2002-new2002-n.tcl actually refers to mix MC and
> > > vubmix-2002-new2002-n.tcl actually refers to nres MC with n<=60.
> > > The vubmix-2002-new2002-n.tcl with n>60 refer to mix MC as is suggested by
> > > their names.
> > >
> > > This is what I did to check this:
> > > I took your reduced ntuples csx-vubnre-new2002.root and
> > > csx-vubix-new2002.root and found the following minima and maxima for the
> > > runumbers:
> > > nre min 1726414
> > > nre max 1726713
> > > mix min 1726714
> > > mix max 1727088
> > >
> > > Then I checked the runnumber min and max in my nre and mix 2002 files and
> > > found the same as in yours. Since there did not seem to be any overlap in
> > > the runnumbers in your 2002 nre and mix files, this should be safe and my
> > > reduced ntuples should originate from the same tcl files as yours.
> > >
> > > BUT:
> > > I just checked the mxhadgen distribution in my 2002 nre files and I find
> > > some entries for mxhadgen < 0.2 < 2*pimass. So there still seems to be
> > > some resonant pollution in this nre file. I will have a look at this and let
> > > you know.
> > >
> > > Kerstin
> > >
> > >
> >
>
