 |
 |
Ciao Kerstin, you should compare with the PRL plots (BAD582) and they look pretty much the same, correct? Don;t ask what changed, we would need an historician ... Also, when we get your analysis on paper we will have to make things uniform with the code we will have at that time, so I think that you are in a pretty good shape as far as reproducing the results is concerned and you can go ahead ciao ric ______________________________________________________ Riccardo Faccini Universita' "La Sapienza" & I.N.F.N. Roma tel +39/06/49914798 Fax.: +39/06/4957697 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~rfaccini Univ. La Sapienza. 2,Ple Aldo Moro, I-00185 Roma Dipartimento di Fisica "I don't understand what you say, but I believe I disagree" W.D. On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Kerstin Tackmann wrote: > > Hi, > > Daniele provided us with some code to produce the plots. When I compare > the output to your plots in the BAD on page 73 I find some differences. > > My plot can be found here: > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~kerstin/s00_mxresult.eps > > At least the following points seem to be different: > - first plot the third data point, maybe also the second. > - second plot the the sixth data point, maybe also the third and fifth > - third plot the errors bars and the sixth and eighth data point > > Is it correct to compare my plot with the one on page 73 of the BAD (v9)? > And if yes what could be the reason for the differences? > > I used the following histograms: > plot 1: > mxonebdata, mxoneballmc, mxoneballbkg, mxonebscaleoth > plot 2: > mxdata, mxallmc, mxallbkg, mxscaleoth > plot 3: > mxsubdata, mxscalevub > > Thanks, > Kerstin > >