 |
 |
Hi all, as consequence of the new "stabilized" version of the mES fit in VirVubFitter [thanks daniele] the "central" BRBR value has again shifted [well within the quoted sys]: Before we were getting ~2.31 (see posting: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~asarti/recoil/talks/validation.html), BRBR = 0.0230708 +- 0.00266732(stat) and now we fit: /u/ec/asarti/scra/IbuDefTestDA/DefTestDAresults.dat: BRBR = 0.0226698 +- 0.00236425(stat) +- 0.000870885(MC stat) I know that those shifts are disturbing but this is the simple effect of the changes in the mES technology. This number should be compared with the other number quoted in the Validation page http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~asarti/recoil/talks/validation.html related to the VubAnalysis code: BRBR = 0.0229841 +- 0.00274219(stat) +- 0.00100995(MC stat) Once again the (dis)agreement btw the two results is largely explained by the uncertainties related to the mES fits. I'm going now to validate the PRL result by switching back to the PRL (1-d) reweighting. Comments or questions are welcomed. alessio ______________________________________________________ Alessio Sarti Universita' & I.N.F.N. Ferrara >>>I'm in Ferrara<<< tel +39-0532-974328 Ferrara roma +39-06-49914338 SLAC +001-650-9262972 Frasc +39-06-94032424 Frascati "... e a un Dio 'fatti il culo' non credere mai..." (F. De Andre') "He was turning over in his mind an intresting new concept in Thau-dimensional physics which unified time, space, magnetism, gravity and, for some reason, broccoli". (T. Pratchett: "Pyramids")