Print

Print


Hi,

this is a question concerning the evaluation of the systematic error
coming from the variation of the m_ES fit parameters (mean, sigma, alpha,
argar) within their errors.
How has this been done exactly?
- Has this been done for data and MC?
- If yes, has it been done independently for all four sets (data, vub MC,
vcb MC, oth MC) and for all fit parameters?
- Which error was taken for the variation of the parameters?

Thanks,
Kerstin